Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superhero debuts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 02:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supervillain chronology, this is crufty and ultimately impossible list to maintain. Category:Superheroes already exists- I propose moving all of the villains on this list into the category, and then Deleting the article. -- Wikipedical 20:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The list appears to be useful, informative, notable, and maintainable. Indices to information are an important part of Wikipedia; few users would want to search every superhero article to extract this data, yet many would find the data useful, for instance, researchers into the development of the superhero genre. RandomCritic 21:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Useful, maintainable, objective index with sources. This is the kind of thing that can be helpful to people doing research. It's not the vague catch-all that "supervillain chronology" is. This is specific. One writer I know has used this article for reference many times while writing about the history of superheroes. Wryspy 22:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Excellent reference source. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 22:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are a finite number of superheros, so how this list is impossible to maintain I dont quite understand. Jcuk 23:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:LIST. - Peregrine Fisher 01:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep easily manageable. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 01:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, this meets both the letter and the spirit of WP:LIST, and is meaningful beyond simple categories. (jarbarf) 00:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, This is a useful list. Dawn22 02:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the commenters above, please withdraw this nomination. Yamaguchi先生 02:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.