Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terence D'Souza
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 16:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- Terence D'Souza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable as their is nothing in WP:RS. Almost sourced with primary sources. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 11:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 11:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 11:18, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I fear that he is only a NN parish priest. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete not enough sources to show notability. The Vicar General is a bit higher than a parish priest, but not high enough for default notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Vicar generals who have not been consecrated bishops are not notable. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.