Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bendrigg Trust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Bendrigg Trust[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for 5 years. Also unreferenced and orphaned. Boleyn (talk) 14:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.Sounds like an excellent organization but I found little coverage beyond directory entries. --Michig (talk) 17:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:16, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- This looks like an outdoor activities centre. Apparently it is near Old Hutton; if so, could be merge it with that - except that we do not have an article on that settlement? Peterkingiron (talk) 14:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.