Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Caledonia Mission

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Stormie (talk) 09:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Caledonia Mission

This is a band with extremely questionable notability. A quick g-search shows no independent reliable sources. The only claim to notability is that they have released two albums, but these have been independent releases as they aren't signed by a record label. Ryan Postlethwaite 13:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above based upon notability or rather the lack thereof. Lovely photo and I wish the band luck but Wikipedia isn't MySpaceMusic and them having an article here at this time is inappropriate. - House of Scandal (talk) 14:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment that adds nothing valuable to the debate half the people I know in my neighborhood have released at least two albums. Doesn't make them noteworthy. - House of Scandal (talk) 20:42, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:MUSIC. LonelyBeacon (talk) 20:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Löschen 'baned' indeed. No notability. DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops, typo fixed! :-) Ryan Postlethwaite 15:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well now you've made my joke look silly. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:53, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence this band meets any of the twelve criteria for sufficient notability at WP:BAND#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. — Satori Son 17:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.