Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Groton Line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete, borderline speedy. BD2412 T 06:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Groton Line

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

seems to be just a Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/thegrotonline/, no references in article Doprendek (talk) 16:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 17:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Absolutely no indication of notability. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG and NCORP. Too local to ever likely achieve notabiity either. SpinningSpark 19:07, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Couldn't find even one source about the subject. Brayan ocaner (talk) 16:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This publication is notable only on a local level. I could find nothing beyond a Facebook page for the Groton Line and a Twitter account for the editor.TH1980 (talk) 23:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.