Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Phantom Hero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 13:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Phantom Hero

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Totally unrefrenced article on an "upcoming book" by a red-linked author. Prod supported by 2nd WPian, then removed by an IP. Original PROD was: "No references and no claims to notability. Quick research shows no coverage in outside sources." Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 20:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination (I was the editor who endorsed the prod). MikeWazowski (talk) 20:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't see any sign of a publishing date (or publisher). Notabily not established and unlikely to be so Tigerboy1966 (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No signs of possible notability. SL93 (talk) 21:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, all future events must be verifiable; no references or citations are given. Article also has significant issues; no references, no indication of notability, written from an in-universe perspective. It reads like someone has just completed the outline for their first novel and has chosen to announce it on Wikipedia, and as such contravenes WP:NOTADVERTISING too. It seems to me this could qualify for WP:SPEEDY#G11.--MegaSloth (talk) 22:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as having been insufficient in-depth coverage by independent third-party sources. If links are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.