Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thompson Valley Composite Squadron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 08:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thompson Valley Composite Squadron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article for an individual Civil Air Patrol squadron, which is roughly akin to a local Boy Scout troop. Squardron's programs follow the national CAP's programs. No indication that this particular squadron has achieved notability, beyond its having a notable parent organization. WP:GNG and WP:SPIP --KRAPENHOEFFER! TALK 08:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons above:

--KRAPENHOEFFER! TALK 08:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all in line with precedent; individual CAP/ATC squadrons are not considered notable. Buckshot06 (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all As Buckshot notes, few cadet units or the like are individually notable per WP:ORG, and these particular units do not seem notable in isolation. Nick-D (talk) 03:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.