Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Rag Magazine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Louisiana Radio Network#College sports. J04n(talk page) 13:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger Rag Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find any substantial independent sources to support notability. A previous PROD expired but was removed (I don't know if this has any bearing). Beevil (talk) 10:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Are you referring to the Google News results? I don't see any article there that mentions Tiger Rag Magazine beyond a simple byline or one sentence comment. Nothing that could be considered significant? Several of the mentions are also from affiliated persons/organisations. Beevil (talk) 17:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.