Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Alderson (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
Allgemein
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Tim Alderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
First round draft pick, however not notable yet. Alex (talk) 02:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Pittsburgh Pirates minor league players.-Spanneraol (talk) 04:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to Keep per Epeefleche and HBWS. --Spanneraol (talk) 00:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable. See here and here.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)][reply]
- Merge to Pittsburgh Pirates minor league players.--Yankees10 06:07, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, meets WP:GNG. First-round draft pick, former member of US national Junior team, California League All-Star. Profiled in East Valley Tribune, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Baseball America's 2010 Prospect Guide (subscribers only), etc. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 19:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, though I didn't mention it, he's currently on the Pirates' 40-man roster. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 20:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Plenty of coverage to support notability. Rlendog (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He's notable, but that page hardly makes it apparent that he is. It needs expansion, not deletion. --Muboshgu (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sources demonstrate significant coverage.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 16:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.