Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Spencer (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 00:47, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Spencer (ice hockey)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NHOCKEY. Fails criteria #2 by 84 games (116 games in AHL inc. playoffs, 200 needed). Tay87 (talk) 19:47, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:09, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:10, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Coverage of usual transactions does not meet the GNG and he fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Sandals1 (talk) 20:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NHOCKEY, WP:GNG and WP:N.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:41, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since subject fails WP:NHOCKEY. None of the six qualifiers applies. -The Gnome (talk) 08:40, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.