Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timmy Turner (character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of The Fairly OddParents characters. Courcelles 00:24, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Timmy Turner (character)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character has no sources. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 17:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merge into the main fairly odd parents articleSeasider91 (talk) 20:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 23:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List of The Fairly OddParents characters - nothing here that's not found there. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge there's as others have suggested. Eeekster (talk) 23:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge seems like a reasonable compromise. Article has no sources to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect&protect There is already Timmy Turner (a longstanding redirect to List of The Fairly OddParents characters#Timmy Turner that unfortunately gets restored to its former WP:FANCRUFT article-self semi-frequently), and it's bad enough to have edit-wars there. WP simply doesn't need another edit-war-magnet redirect to watch. Also, if it was decided to have an article for this character, the discussion needs to take place at/for Timmy Turner, not this article with the disambiguator. – sgeureka ^t•c 06:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect. I am sure sources exist for the character, but until they are found, it does not need to be split. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 15:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and protect against re-creation: Per Sgeureka. The fictional character as a stand-alone subject does not meet the general notability guideline. The content is mostly a plot-only description of a fictional work, so I believe that a merge is not justified. As the article title has disambiguation, it is not a plausible search term, so I believe that a redirect is not justified either, particularly not when there is already a redirect without disambiguation. Jfgslo (talk) 01:33, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.