Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To the Sky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 04:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- To the Sky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable album. All the sources are from a blog and the only other source is a billboard chart to the album's only single. Str8cash (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP Noteable album by noteable artist. The blog is a interview notes from the artist. Its well sourced and a good article for an album that is not out yet. STATicVerseatide talk 21:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kommentar It still violates WP:CRYSTAL. Many artists have albums planned for release this year and many of those albums don't have articles. Just because it's confirmed doesn't mean it should have its own article. Str8cash (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kommentar It doesnt have any perdictions in the article all the info in there is right and sourced so it does not Violate WP:CRYSTAL. STATicVerseatide talk 22:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment From WP:CRYSTAL "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Dates are not definite until the event actually takes place." Str8cash (talk) 23:45, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kommentar It doesnt have any perdictions in the article all the info in there is right and sourced so it does not Violate WP:CRYSTAL. STATicVerseatide talk 22:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kommentar It still violates WP:CRYSTAL. Many artists have albums planned for release this year and many of those albums don't have articles. Just because it's confirmed doesn't mean it should have its own article. Str8cash (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with a move to userspace/article incubator. Not enough for an article yet, but it looks like it will be released within 2 months when it will very likely be sufficiently notable, so move out of mainspace until there are enough sources for an article.--Michig (talk) 08:20, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:CRYSTAL balling is a waste of time. The only notable thing about the single is the fact that it was used as a theme song for WrestleMania XXVI. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 03:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment wtf r u talking about it doesnt even say that in the article. AND the fuckin single peaked in the Top 40 how is that not noteable. This album is muderpuckin notable. STAT- Verse 03:25, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.