Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Fight Night
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:35, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Total Fight Night (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable sporting event. Only one notable competitor (who happens to also be the event promoter, see Lee Hasdell). Only sources are a broken link and a reference to an article that appears to be about the event promoter (I was unable to verify the reference as it does not appear to be archived online). Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 14:16, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 20:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found nothing to show this event passes WP:SPORTSEVENT. Appears to be another case of routine sports reporting. Jakejr (talk) 19:08, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can find no sources to support the notability of this single event. Due to the date, more coverage would likely exist in print media, of which the article cites only one source (the external link in the article is also broken). Without someone coming forward with additional sources, event appears to fail WP:GNG and certainly fails WP:ROUTINE and WP:SPORTSEVENT. --TreyGeek (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:EVENT and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. No sourcing which meets any section of EVENT. WP:ROUTINE coverage. Not all sporting events are notable (and this one's not even close). BusterD (talk) 14:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.