Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Force Freestyle Karate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Total Force Freestyle Karate

Notability sub style non-evidence of multiple schools unsourced. see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nippon Shorin Ryu Kenpo Nate1481(^t/_c) 17:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- A just formed fighting style by one guy? Needs time to catch on which it may not do. How many students are learning this as an exclusive style? Not buying it. Promotional.---Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 18:16, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not promotional. It is merely information I requested from it's founder, and I put it on here. I know it is new, but every martial art was new at one time. I am learning it, and there are about 35 or so students of his that are learning it. I gave links to associations that recognize him and his art.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.191.218.80 (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of martial arts-related deletions. -- Nate1481(^t/_c) 17:45, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sorry, but we need independent sources to establish notability here. Neither of the linked sites actually mentions Total Force Freestyle, and I was not able to turn up a single reference via Google search. When it gets some significant industry and/or press coverage, then an article may be appropriate. Maralia (talk) 02:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. JJL (talk) 16:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at ICMAUA.com, and go to members a-k, you will see it is listed there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billycook3 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sounds like the founder might be notable, but the school is too recently created to be without further assertions of notability. Bradford44 (talk) 01:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable. jj137 (Talk) 16:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

what will it hurt you to leave it here. It doesn't hurt you at all —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billycook3 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.