Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UKIP (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (WP:SNOW) -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UKIP (disambiguation)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DAB page with only two entries, one of which is a clear primary topic and one which doesn't have its own article. Hatnote on United Kingdom Independence Party would suffice, and reduce the number of clicks for a user Joseph2302 (talk) 07:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that a hatnote is all that would be needed, with the added note about the company's name change. Something like, Not to be confused with UKi Media & Events, formerly known as UKIP Media & Events. though ideally somehow with less redundancy. —⁠烏⁠Γ ^(kaw) │ 09:21, 09 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find any other articles to include in the dab page, so there's just one non-primary entry, which makes this page redundant to a hatnote. – Uanfala (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 12:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 12:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, but definitely add the hatnote. Gimubrc (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, disambiguation is not required, and take the redirect UKIP Media and Events to WP:RfD because it is not mentioned at the target article. There should not be a hatnote to an article that doesn't mention the term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:05, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with above, there's a clear primary topic and a hatnote can be used (if even required which I doubt) for the other topic. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.