Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valdet Gashi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Pretty clear that this AfD should never have been opened. Favonian (talk) 15:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valdet Gashi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability as a former Muay Thai World Champion who later joined Isil. Appears to pass WP:KICKGUIDE CrazyAces489 (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. CrazyAces489 (talk) 22:09, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Don't understand the point of creating a poor stub and then submitting it to AfD debate. Not clear to me which world championship he won - some are notable, some are not but the replacement article clearly demonstrates notability - he received enough media coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to work with others now. So what am I doing wrong? I am nominating articles that might have questionable notability. CrazyAces489 (talk) 04:16, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have tried this before the noticeboard. So it isn't to make a point. [2] I thought this might show that I am trying to work with others. CrazyAces489 (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Working with others would be submitting an article to AFC or writing a draft and asking for input prior to putting it into live space. This is merely a subtle way of continuing "I create so others can work" by disguising it as something else. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.