Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valodya Frangulyan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. That the subject has articles on several other-language wikis is absolutely irrelevant. Winning multiple gold medals would prevent an A7, but if there are no reliable sources with in-depth information we cannot have an article. Randykitty (talk) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Valodya Frangulyan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG Nswix (talk) 17:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sports, Martial arts, Wrestling, and Armenia. Nswix (talk) 17:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - The guy won multiple gold medals at international events and has 5 other wiki pages, so he's relevant. His page just needs a properly written article about what he has done.KatoKungLee (talk) 21:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Please note that different language wikis have different definitions of notability. The existence of other pages is therefore absolutely irrelevant and any !vote based on this will be disregarded.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The three UWW.org are non-independent database hits, N. [1] is a routine fight announcement, N. [2] I can't access. [3] is not independent, N. [4] is a routine results recap that is mostly quotes, N. [5] is a passing mention in more results, N. [6] is a trivial mention, N. Ditto for [7], N. The 7 youtube links are just primary coverage of matches, N. Fails GNG. JoelleJay (talk) 22:01, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per source analysis above, doesn't meet any notability standard Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.