Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernon Rieta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vernon Rieta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's nothing to show he meets the notability standards for martial artists. His acting career consists of stunts and playing unnamed characters. The only sources seem to be some local coverage of his art show, which doesn't appear to be significant. Fails WP:MANOTE, WP:NACTOR, WP:ARTIST, and WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 17:58, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This was created with a single purpose account - any one want to bet this is not a self authored advert. Notability is not established.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Likely autobiography of someone who, as nom points out, does not meet any notability criteria. Astudent0 (talk) 05:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.