Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Villamagna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - Again not a valid reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 20:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Villamagna

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

there needs to be a lot of improvement on the content Daniel kenneth (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep. This clearly passes the notability criteria at Wikipedia:GEOLAND and has a lengthy article in the Italian Wikipedia (it:Villamagna) as well as articles in over 30 other Wikipedias. Needing "a lot of improvement" is never a reason to delete an article. It is a reason to improve it. There are multiple sources available for this article. I have added just a few. Voceditenore (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per WP:SK1 and Voceditenore. The nom has advanced no reason for deletion. AfD is not clean-up. Oakshade (talk) 19:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep as above, and per WP:BEFORE. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.