Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viper karate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:28, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Viper karate

Another HOAX. The third and fourth references do not mention the subject; the first is a WP article and says nothing about martial arts, let alone "Viper Karate"; the second is a general book about Bhutan. Searches - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL - get nothing relevant about "Viper karate". The only faintly relevant thing I can find anywhere is that the WP article about Bando says "The American Bando Association incorporates 9 animal systems including: bull, boar, cobra, viper, python, panther, tiger, scorpion & eagle." But Bando is a Burmese martial arts system, and there is no source for all the article's guff, sorry picturesque detail, about its origins in Bhutan. I can't find "Fosta" or the "peak of Fostaloush" either, or any of the red-linked people (see talk page). The citing of references that don't mention the subject, and an author Palo123 (talk · contribs) with no other edits who has not returned to defend his creation, indicate that this is not just an obscure subject but a deliberate hoax. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:14, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:V and therefore WP:N. Nothing about this article checks out. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The links provided do not even have the word "viper" in the text of the pages. I also call WP:HOAX. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 14:17, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 14:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an almost certain hoax. Can't even find the names of most of teh alleged practitioners on the web. JJL (talk) 15:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete personally I'd have put it up for speedy as spam but also very likely to be a hoax --Nate 14 81 10:37, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

My apologies for entering first had information that from a six month stay overseas. I have not conformed to your format, nor can any new information be published in this forum. Good Luck to you all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Palo123 (talk • contribs) 01:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]