Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W&G Sissons

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 14:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

W&G Sissons

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Not to be confused with the silversmith of the same name. Kleuske (talk) 13:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I think this company is the successor of the silversmith - see [1]. My first impression is that there is an article to be had out of this company. It's now part of Franke (company). Mcewan (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's the same company, there's an article in there, sure, but it would have to focus on the notable (i.e. silversmith) part. However, the article does not give an indication of that. Kleuske (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Delete. The only indication this article gives is that the author has mistaken Wikipedia for a business listing site. Fails WP:ORG. WP:NOTDIR. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.