Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WRAP-LD
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- WRAP-LD (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV from secondary sources to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Ohio. Let'srun (talk) 14:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Advertising. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete No significant coverage in reliable sources. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Even with a three-decade history, a low-power station carrying only national services in the shadow of much-larger stations in a large market is often a recipe for no significant coverage. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.