Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wesley Murch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:12, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wesley Murch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

MMA fighter with no notable fights with no notable organizations. His only "claim to fame" is an appearance in a MMA related reality TV show in which he was injured. Google search provides fight records and not much else. --TreyGeek (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —TreyGeek (talk) 01:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 07:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He is an up and coming fighter who owns and coaches at a well respected MMA Training camp in the UK. Also I will be adding much more and will keep in very up to date. Please do not delete. --Dargla (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is an unsourced BLP of a fighter who fails the notability criteria at WP:MMANOT. Papaursa (talk) 19:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fighter who fails to meet WP:MMANOT. "Up and coming" doesn't make him notable nor does running a gym. Lacks reliable sources to support any claims of notability. Astudent0 (talk) 15:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nn fighter and article needs reliable sources. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 15:19, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia:N. Aside from an interview, the article doesn't gain much notability for his matchs. SwisterTwister (talk) 06:12, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.