Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Will Fat Cat Sit On?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 23:34, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What Will Fat Cat Sit On?

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Non notable, apparently fails GNG Zhoushou (talk)~~ 20:51, 23 May 2023 (UTC) (sock strike Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and United States of America. Skynxnex (talk) 21:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Two reviews by reliable publications and one by a public library (all three are already in the article) add up to notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passes WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG from the sources already present in the article. pburka (talk) 21:12, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Aside from the reviews already in the article, there is also this one from Kirkus Reviews. All together, this is a pass of WP:NBOOK. Rorshacma (talk) 22:28, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:NB — Maile (talk) 00:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG Linda (talk ... stalk!) 00:29, 24 May 2023 (UTC) strike sock-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: three national-level sources giving WP:SIGCOV in article: Publishers Weekly might be dubious as it links to pages selling the book (and so presumably earns commission), but see also this review in School Library Journal. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CU note Nominator has been checkuser blocked.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NBOOK and clearly has enough sources. Archrogue (talk) 17:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.