Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Lincoln Bakewell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nakon 05:09, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

William Lincoln Bakewell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a minor member on the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition doesn't satisfy WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page for the same reason:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or Merge both to Personnel of the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition. So many detailed accounts have been written of the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition (even one focussing on the ship's cat) that, in practice, being a minor member on it probably does satisfy WP:BIO. Having said that, the same few facts for each (though apparently a few more for Blackborow than for Bakewell) get repeated in the various sources - Bakewell being American, Bakewell smuggling Blackborow onto the ship as a stowaway, Shackleton's reaction when Blackborow is discovered, Blackborow being chosen as the first person to land on Elephant Island, Blackborow's toes becoming gangrenous and having to be cut off, the photo of Blackborow with the cat on his shoulder - which may make summarising them in the article on the expedition's personnel a slightly better idea than standalone articles. PWilkinson (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:26, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep since an entire book was written about him, it should be easy to expand. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 22:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I disagree with the fact that the only American on-board a significant expedition isn't notable. He also has a published version of his memoir. Kharkiv07 ^Talk 21:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.