Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfbagging
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 15:10, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dubious sexual practice, precious little verification other than anecdote in chat boards and an entry in urbandictionary.com and this at sex-lexis.com. Delete unless a proper cite can be provided. -- The Anome 00:48, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Löschen If a citation can be provided, the term can be Merged with the anal sex article, there is no reason for it to be separate. -- (aeropagitica) 01:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - If I try to verify this term on Google I will have to go to confession. Endomion 02:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, 0 results on google image search says it's not in wide use. (And per above.) - Bobet 02:32, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn --Pboyd04 02:43, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless verified. Movementarian 04:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, we must stop adding unverified sexual practices to Wikipedia. -- Kjkolb 07:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Whatever. --Kilo-Lima 16:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I've restored the article's history for the moment; it's been deleted three times since the new logging system went in about a year ago, and at least three times prior to that. Besides a bunch of patent nonsense, there are two revisions that contain somewhat more substantial articles than the current. (Not, er, that I genuinely think this should be kept... but they're not quite so bad as the current version.) —Cryptic (talk) 16:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or merge into anal sex, Gronky 13:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.