Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku 4 (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Without prejudice to a subsequent redirection to World Victory Road. Sandstein 13:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku 4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
as per my last nomination. I think there is now clearer consensus of the notability of fighting events that are simply series for other events. also nominating:
- World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku 2
- World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku 3
- World Victory Road Presents: Sengoku 1
all fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. routine non notable sporting results LibStar (talk) 08:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 13:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep all - Sengoku events were fairly notable as far as MMA goes. The promotion has been host to many worldwide-known fighters; some of them whilst they have been ranked in the top 10/20 of a respective weight division. Sengoku is now finished, so there aren't going to be any more events to outshine the events in question here. As such, the interest in these early events will always be high as long as there is interest in Sengoku's legacy. In short, I don't think these events were "routine" Paralympiakos (talk) 20:25, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all These articles contain nothing but the sports results (WP:ROUTINE). In addition, the sources are also just routine sports reporting. There were no championship fights at these events and nothing to show these events qualify as notable under WP:SPORTSEVENT. I agree the events had plenty of notable fighters, but that alone doesn't make the events notable (WP:NOTINHERITED). Papaursa (talk) 23:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see anything but routine sports coverage. There's nothing but results and nothing to show the events have long-term importance. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All There's nothing to show these events pass WP:SPORTSEVENT and all the coverage is WP:ROUTINE. I agree about the notable fighters, but there's nothing significant about these individual fight cards. Mdtemp (talk) 20:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect all to World Victory Road, where they are already mentioned. I can't find sources that would indicate anything more than routine coverage, but the pages would be useful redirects. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 01:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.