Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoshiyuki Nakanishi
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yoshiyuki Nakanishi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced, fails WP:NMMA, WP:NOR, WP:V... LlamaAl (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Subject has fought for Deep (mixed martial arts) but is not recognized as a top-tier promotion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability and ultimately does not meet WP:NMMA. No significant coverage outside WP:ROUTINE for his events and does not meet WP:GNG as the alternate policy. Mkdwtalk 21:49, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep being a champion in a second tier promotion gives notability. Sepulwiki (talk) 07:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You have your own guideline and criteria, but I prefer WP:NMMA. --LlamaAl (talk) 01:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Has no fights for a top tier MMA organization so he fails WP:NMMA. The article's only link is to his fight record and there are no other sources given. Papaursa (talk) 02:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - LlamaAl above is correct, the "Keep" vote is not consistent with the WP:NMMA criteria. --Noleander (talk) 18:37, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NMMA with no fights for a top tier organization. Being champion of a second tier organization doesn't show notability and having no significant coverage doesn't help his notability claim.Mdtemp (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.