Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zen Nihon Sogo Budo Renmei

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 15:11, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zen Nihon Sogo Budo Renmei

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see how this article might meet WP:ORG, nor even attempt to assert that it meets that notability criteria. — Fly by Night (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'Comment This was a little fast off the mark. I agree it does not seem notable at all but a notability tag added to a newly created article seems the better route - then if references and clarification are not forthcoming (say a week or so later) then AfD. The author of the page has created several other pages of questionable notability but worse in response to this has tried to AfD a well established and notable organization International Kendo Federation out of revenge?? He did it by copy/paste so I don't even know if it would show up. His editing style has been called into question in the past.Peter Rehse (talk) 05:44, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it was a little fast off the mark. But as it happens, little or no editing has taken place since since my tag. So I think efficient might be a better description ;-) Regarding the AfD template: no AfD discussion page was created and no AfD listing was made. I also think that the International Kendo Federation is notable. I've removed the AfD tag. — Fly by Night (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article has no independent sources and gives no indication of why this organization is notable. Papaursa (talk) 18:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is almost a direct copy of the web site. Most notable is that it talks about holding the events in the past - is it still active?Peter Rehse (talk) 00:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Peter, lack of independent, verifiable sources. - Mailer Diablo 01:50, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG --Tgeairn (talk) 02:27, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.