Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 October 8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 8

[edit]

Category:People who were forced disappeared

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Ungrammatical and seems to duplicate Category:Forced disappearances. Zanhe (talk) 22:52, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle: It contained three articles: Forced disappearance, Dong Yaoqiong, and Meng Hongwei (who was arrested, not "disappeared"). -Zanhe (talk) 18:14, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:TemplateData documentation

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:25, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate categories on same topic {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 22:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No strong objection. The later category is populated by Template:TemplateData header. Neither category is particularly comprehensive. Wikipedia:TemplateData/List does a better job.--Salix alba (talk): 07:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Bacteria described in the 1780s

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:21, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Follow-up removal of empty bacteria decadal categories, per WP:TREE RFC @ Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life#Request for comment: categorizing by year of formal description. See previous, related CfDs here, here, and here.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  20:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WT:TREE & WT:MICRO notified.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  21:01, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Catholic Church offices

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 October 17#Category:Catholic Church offices. xplicit 03:54, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Pretty much identical scope? For any entry that cannot be dealt with as inside an identical scope should probably rather be subcategorised somewhere else? Chicbyaccident (talk) 07:38, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure either. It is rather unclear. That's why I think this category merits some reconsidering. Chicbyaccident (talk) 13:30, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People associated with the New Deal

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (@Marcocapelle:, I will ask you to purge what needs to go.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete most of the content per WP:OCASSOC, most people in the category are government officials and presidential advisors in the period of the New Deal (who can be classified by their function/role); there are also a few opponents of the New Deal, but note we already have a List of critics of the New Deal. However, Franklin D. Roosevelt and the two subcategories should be moved into Category:New Deal. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People associated with chocolate

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:OCASSOC and WP:SMALLCAT. No need to merge, the content is already elsewhere in the tree of Category:Chocolate. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:28, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.