Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 11

[edit]

Former baseball leagues

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge multiple categories per the proposal. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 21:43, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 03:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Same subject. Unnecessary duplicate level of categorization. Editor2020 (talk) 23:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Christianity WikiProjects

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 04:00, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Duplication of subject. Unneccessary duplicative level of category Editor2020 (talk) 23:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 04:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: duplication of subject Editor2020 (talk) 23:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Types of fire

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 January 19#Category:Types of fire

Category:Works about race and ethnicity

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge certain sub-cats as discussed. E.g. Category:Jewish American novels should not be in Category:Novels about race and ethnicity; it belongs rather in Category:American novels by ethnic background (and is in that one already). – Fayenatic London 21:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Hopefully I did this correct enough, Twinkle doesn't seem to work for this.

I haven't followed every branch, but one example: Category:Books about race and ethnicity leads to Category:Novels about race and ethnicity which leads to, among others Category:African-American novels, Category:Hispanic and Latino American novels and Category:Jewish American novels. My point is that, IMO, none of these by necessity are 100% about race and ethnicity, take for example Category:Novels by Isaac Asimov. Some serious cutting seems to be in order.Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:41, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films based on works by John Green (author)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 04:23, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Novels by John Green (author)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 04:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who use VSCodium

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Cosmology articles needing infoboxes

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:37, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unused maintenance category, and most cosmology articles don't need an infobox. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 17:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Buried in Bydgoszcz

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 21:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Public Utilities Commission elections

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete per author request (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 04:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Errantly created title SecretName101 (talk) 12:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Non-English Teams in the FA Cup

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 21:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I believe this is a non-defining category, as for almost all the teams in the category, there is little or no mention of playing in the FA Cup in their respective articles, because it isn't a key part of their history. Note: This was discussed briefly at WT:FOOTY, and will notify them at that discussion Joseph2302 (talk) 12:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rugby union players from Kidderminster

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:39, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 article. Luis9595 (talk) 10:12, 11 January 2022 (GMT)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of honors and awards received by presidents of the United States

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 21:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Naturalised soccer players by nationality

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Naturalised association football players by nationality. – Fayenatic London 21:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: – It should not be restricted to countries that use the term 'soccer'. Many countries in the world that do not use that word have ever had those type of players too. Neutral term 'association football' should be applied instead. Then, not sure if 'naturalized' or 'naturalised'. The category was left in Category:Naturalized citizens by nation and Category:Naturalised sports competitors, which is puzzling.--MonFrontieres (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.