Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 8
Appearance
September 8
[edit]Category:Professors by rank of the Academy of Arts
[edit] Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Category:Professors by rank of the Academy of Arts
Frogs and toads in culture
[edit] Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Frogs and toads in culture
Category:Amphibians in human culture
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Amphibians in human culture to Category:Amphibians in culture (over redirect)
- Nominator's rationale: To match other existing categories in the surrounding hierarchy. The current name was chosen by the (now blocked) user Caftaric, and was perhaps intended to distinguish from Aquaculture. The only other one using "human culture" is Category:Fish in human culture, which was also created by Caftaric and is perhaps more justifiable. – Fayenatic London 21:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support, the word "human" is redundant. Note that there is also Category:Reptiles in human culture to be renamed. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:07, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support No real distinction, unless we are somehow counting distinct cultures in non-human primates. Dimadick (talk) 14:00, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of Lepidoptera genera (alphabetic)
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: merge, the parent category contains only one article and "(alphabetic)" is not a useful distinction versus the parent category. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support - one of user:NotWith's more bizarre creations. Oculi (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support - Serves essentially no purpose distinct from that of the parent category. AddWittyNameHere 09:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:NewJeans
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Too few articles for an eponymous category per WP:OCEPON; sufficient navigation exists between the two subcategories. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support, standard procedure when only a main article, a songs subcat and an albums subcat exist. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dhatki people
[edit] Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Category:Dhatki people
Category:Country names using United and States
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: procedural close, the category has already been deleted (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: Spurious category Davidelit (Talk) 03:31, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- I started this category. It’s a subcategory of Category:Country names. If this new category I made is spurious, would it still be spurious if changed to something more similar to other subcategories of Category:Country names? For example, I’d be glad to change it to Category:Names like United States or Category:United States’s or Category:Countries named United States. Anythingyouwant (talk) 03:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Löschen, in the spirit of WP:SHAREDNAME. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:18, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Good to know, thanks, I’m going to go ahead and empty this category, and do speedy delete. Anythingyouwant (talk) 06:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional extraterrestrial royalty
[edit] Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Category:Fictional extraterrestrial royalty
Category:Hintata
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 21:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Nominator's rationale: delete, the category only contains the Hafsid dynasty who already have their own subcategory. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:08, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Oculi (talk) 09:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.