Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 January 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion

< January 28	January 30 >

January 29

File:1973 NBA Case Book.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:1973 NBA Case Book.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by RyguyMN (notify | contribs | uploads).

WP:NFCC#8 - cover image not subject of discussion Mosmof (talk) 04:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BenDavisRookie.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BenDavisRookie.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by ClairSamoht (notify | contribs | uploads).

WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#8 - card or card image not discussed in the article. Mosmof (talk) 04:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bream1992.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bream1992.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by UNCCTF (notify | contribs | uploads).

WP:NFCC#8 - simply being a historic moment is not sufficient to meet WP:NFCC. Mosmof (talk) 04:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ae9a.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ae9a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sasi kanaparthy (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:368147080 77bf51a194.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:368147080 77bf51a194.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Flaviano (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:369689239 e0ba965757 o.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:369689239 e0ba965757 o.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joe31689 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:370130.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:370130.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shanu12360 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:371011142 70e875a193 o.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:371011142 70e875a193 o.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Michaelsiemer (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3714.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:3714.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Schaequinn (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:13, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not likely to be used for an encyclopedic purpose. Nyttend (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:374596919 l.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:374596919 l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tonym130 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated, possible copyvio. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not likely to be used for an encyclopedic purpose. Nyttend (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:38011653 952785dd33 o.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:38011653 952785dd33 o.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mind meal (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it does say that the subject is supposed to be Dennis Genpo Merzel. However, I seem to be unable to verify the license status of the Flickr original. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 02:52, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3822.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:3822.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Andy pryor22 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:38346445946471l.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:38346445946471l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Megr1124 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not likely to be used. Nyttend (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:386277045 l.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:386277045 l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Tresb (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if we don't know what/where this is, we can't use it properly. Nyttend (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3883972206.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:3883972206.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ivan plapp (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if we don't know what/where this is, we can't use it properly. Nyttend (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3975985d.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:3975985d.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by BBX (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated, possible copyvio. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I'd call this a likely copyvio. As well, if we don't know what/where this is, we can't use it properly. Nyttend (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4-19.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete, while the subject looks to have been found, there is still inadequate license and source information.

File:4-19.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sathishnayar (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Löschen, if we don't know what/where this is, we can't use it properly. Nyttend (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A bit of searching suggests that the building is the Rockfort Ucchi Pillayar Temple. We don't seem to have too many pictures of it, so I'd say keep (and move to Commons). —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 02:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4-2-07 013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:4-2-07 013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by BeastKing89 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, if we don't know what/where this is, we can't use it properly. Nyttend (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to be a former userpage picture of a user who claims to have left Wikipedia in 2008. Not much point in keeping this. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 02:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4-27-2006-02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:4-27-2006-02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Inmate20 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:40600239.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 13:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:40600239.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Johnnyheck (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The aircraft in this image appears to be a Titan T-51 Mustang (specifically this one). While it could use some brightness adjustment, I'd say this looks like a perfectly useful and encyclopedic free photo. Keep. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 08:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:40697459 derby3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:40697459 derby3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ricky87 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:406 0614.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:406 0614.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Ngchikit (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4075890a49f50d0c94ca6b6b.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:4075890a49f50d0c94ca6b6b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mickeyinchina (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated, possible copyvio. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:407856247 e14767c8fe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:407856247 e14767c8fe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dimboukas (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:24, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:408587884 358853aab7 o-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:408587884 358853aab7 o-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Themeparkphoto (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:26, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:40969672ez1vh0.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:40969672ez1vh0.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kabdoun (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:410.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:410.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Skater710 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:41802222 balochmengal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:41802222 balochmengal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Seema0300 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:41986522 chen ap203.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:41986522 chen ap203.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Yosts5 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:430085401a5804499677l-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:430085401a5804499677l-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Azzwar (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:440799176noqklo ph 1 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:440799176noqklo ph 1 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by P5carroll (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:44039776.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:44039776.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Proudjafa (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:442525565a560072885b59276157l.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:442525565a560072885b59276157l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Fitzgack (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:442898701 88b12bf42e.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:442898701 88b12bf42e.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Rajaeger (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:445529213 m.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:445529213 m.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zeusofficial (notify | contribs | uploads).

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Boricevic dynasts Bosnia sm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boricevic dynasts Bosnia sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Bosnipedian (notify | contribs | uploads).

Unencyclopedic orphan. Constructed from unreliable information on a page that was deleted as an incoherent hoax. DrKiernan (talk) 08:14, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Serbian military budget.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serbian military budget.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by FC Toronto (notify | contribs | uploads).

This image of budget numbers for three years is far too wide for the value that it adds to the article. The bars are each too wide and there is too much space between them. The vertical scale shows a small segment of numbers so that the budget appears to have greatly increased, more than doubled, but it has increased by about 36%. This image does not help the reader more than a simple description in words. Instead, it tricks the reader visually.

As well, the data has no listed source to support it. Binksternet (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Srb military budget.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Srb military budget.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by FC Toronto (notify | contribs | uploads).

This image has no source listed to support the data it shows.

Furthermore, its visual aspects are designed to fluff the data and puff up the importance of the increase in two years. The vertical scale is reduced to show a greater increase, the bars are each too wide, and the space between the bars is far too large. The overall effect is to trick the viewer. Binksternet (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bombtrack-pinkpop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bombtrack-pinkpop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Delapeople (notify | contribs).

Non-free image that is VERY similar to another one in the same article. The small differences can very easily be described with the image alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) CrowzRSA ^{17:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brian Moynihan BofA.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brian Moynihan BofA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by DMCer (notify | contribs | uploads).

Living person. Replaceable by free photo at http://www.flickr.com/photos/worldeconomicforum/4312996429. Sandstein 17:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Uploaded new free verison here and replaced article image.—DMCer™ 21:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glasgowpictures.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glasgowpictures.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sash 1990 (notify | contribs | uploads).

This composite image claims to be original work "I (Sash 1990 (talk)) created this work entirely by myself." it clearly isn't. I created the image at the top (see [1] and no attribution is given). I suspect the other images will also be unaknowledged rip-offs) Scott Mac (Doc) 20:10, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nannini Imola 1986.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nannini Imola 1986.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

Image was not created before 1976 (thus, not PD-Italy). Nannini would be 17 years old. The file name says 1986. Image is not found on source and no information on the author is documented on the image description page. Damiens.rf 22:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New worlds assassination.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:New worlds assassination.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

We don't need to see this non-free magazine cover to understand that Mr. Ballard had a story published there. Damiens.rf 22:15, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Pietro in Vincoli Roma.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Pietro in Vincoli Roma.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

Not used. Also, "No (C) stated, State site" is not a reason to believe it's PD. Damiens.rf 22:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, failure to claim copyright is no longer a reason for an image to be in the public domain. Nyttend (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Pietro in Vincoli interior.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Pietro in Vincoli interior.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

"no (C) states" is not a reason to believe this is PD. Damiens.rf 22:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, failure to claim copyright is no longer a reason for an image to be in the public domain. Nyttend (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nicola Pietrangeli.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nicola Pietrangeli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

"it.wikipedia" is not a valid (verifiable) source. Damiens.rf 22:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Giuseppe Saronni.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giuseppe Saronni.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

Non-free image of a living man. No information on copyright holder. Damiens.rf 22:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HugoPratt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HugoPratt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Hiding (notify | contribs | uploads).

No explanation for why we can use this copyrighted work under fair use. Probably, uploader had the good faith mistaken believe that if we really need an image and can't produce one, we can use copyrighted work under fair use. Damiens.rf 22:26, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. You'll have to walk me through in what sense there isn't an explanation, since I posted one to the image description page, that the image will "allow a visual identification of Hugo Pratt to increase the reader's mental image and understanding of the man, delineating physical aspects." This is not a commercial photograph, therefore it is not explicitly barred from use and the nominator, whilst believing in good faith that this image should not remain, has failed to demonstrate how it breaches the relevant policy, Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria. Hiding T 14:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nonantola Bolognesi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nonantola Bolognesi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

Not used. No reason to believe it's PD. Damiens.rf 22:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ondata di piacere.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ondata di piacere.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

Non-free dvd cover used to illustrate what that actress looks like. Damiens.rf 22:28, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Duomo Modena Wiligelm.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Duomo Modena Wiligelm.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

"it.wikipedia.org" is not a valid source. Damiens.rf 22:29, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, appears to be a copyvio from [2]. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 08:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angelo Branduardi chitarra.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: The result of the discussion was: Keep; solution offered and implemented. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:21, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Angelo Branduardi chitarra.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

"it.wikipedia.org" not a valid verifiable source. Damiens.rf 22:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, source is it:File:Angelo_Branduardi_chitarra.JPG. I've changed the description page to reflect this. Nyttend (talk) 16:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Cataldo Palermo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Cataldo Palermo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Attilios (notify | contribs | uploads).

No reason to believe itś PD. Damiens.rf 22:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2010_January_29&oldid=1138517064"