Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 May 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 18

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:James blunt - you're beautiful.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Indopug (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Redundant file, too long. This music listening sample is too large at 30 seconds, which is about 14% of the total song. The instructions at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music samples say that our samples should be no more than 10% of the song duration or 30 seconds, whichever is shorter. Another edited (shorter) file exists to fix this problem: File:James Blunt - You're Beautiful (Edit).ogg. Binksternet (talk) 00:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 00:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washburn Rural old logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Corkythehornetfan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I have concerns that this logo may not meet WP:NFCC #8 - the current (non-free) logo of the school is already included in the article for primary identification purposes, and this former logo is not discussed in the article. I'm concerned this may not meet fair use requirements. Hog Farm Talk 03:31, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - The old logo is not really being used for identification and is not discussed critically at all in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. -- 15:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 00:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:BillAndTedDoubleFeature.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Damiantgordon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

"For example, an excerpt of a significant artistic work is usually included only in the article about the work, which is then referenced in the articles about its performer and its publisher." This Bill & Ted triple feature boxset image for Bill & Ted#Films is already represented by the non-free images on Bill & Ted's Bogus Journey, Bill & Ted Face the Music and Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 07:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 00:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:GLF GUJARATI LOGO.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Imfarhad7 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Redundant to File:GLF GUJARATI LOGO.svg. Jonteemil (talk) 13:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Several Pricess Daisy files

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 00:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Princess daisy tokyo 2020 by daquanharrison16.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Error 365 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:MarioGolfWorldTourPrincessDaisy.webp (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Error 365 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:SuperMarioStrikersDaisy.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Error 365 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

These multiple non-free images of Princess Daisy in the body of the Princess Daisy article are substiantially similar with only the costuming being different. There is alreay what could be considered the canonical look for the character in the infobox. The claimed purpose is to showcase the chacater design in differnt games but there is no significant sourced discussion about the the differences. To be blunt, even if there were such sourced commentary, these are just cotume alterations and their removal does not detract from the understanding of the article. Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whpq (talkcontribs) 17:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 00:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daisy Mario Party 3.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by (Oinkers42) (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image is stated to be used to showcase Daisy's prior design, but the only text about that is in the image caption. There is no significant sourced commentary about the image design. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 17:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. plicit 00:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pats cap.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PennaRican81 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails Wp:NFCC#8. Jonteemil (talk) 19:37, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 May 28. MBisanz talk 02:00, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Williamsport Crosscutters (cap logo).png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 May 28. MBisanz talk 02:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:SharksCap.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.