Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 August 10

August 10

File:Young woman with her head thrown back.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved, uploader has clarified the image's provenance. -FASTILY 09:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Data contradiction: private collection / published + published in Paris / published in the USA. — Ирука¹³ 05:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The painting was presented for the first time in Paris in 1920. Since then it has belonged to different owners. Currently, it is part of a private collection. Many works that have fallen into the public domain are part of private collections. For example, the Paul Allen Collection.

I took the photo during its presentation as part of an exhibition at the Musée du Luxembourg in Paris from March 2 to July 10, 2022 whose title was: Pionières - Artistes dans le Paris des années folles (Pioneers - Artists in the Paris of the Roaring Twenties).

Best regards, Ssirdeck (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:'Red Canvas' by Richard Tuttle, 1967, Corcoran Gallery of Art.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the articles listed on the file description page require this particular image. In four out of five, the image was replaced with free analogues. In one contributor objected with the rationale: better before. Forgetting that Commons is littered with such works, a similar polygon-like image of any color and shape can be created at any time (WP:NFCC#1). — Ирука¹³ 06:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mon Gualvez Frontline.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

problematic user. Unlike that own works. E.g. this one from YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZwVPNKZUtM Estopedist1 (talk) 08:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amjad Ali Khan Indian Vocalist 1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity. Unlike that own work. No EXIF-data Estopedist1 (talk) 08:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ben Gluck.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not established user. Unlike that own work. File about the celebrity Estopedist1 (talk) 08:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Exhibition Vide et Plein.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File from Facebook. Unlike that own work. I suspect same problem with his other uploading: File:Christophe Février.png Estopedist1 (talk) 09:11, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ZekeMart.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Author unknown, source and publication date unknown. — Ирука¹³ 10:36, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IntegrationPyramid.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for sculptures. — Ирука¹³ 11:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, mislabelled non-free file with a lack of critical commentary for its use in Landmarks and Monuments of Florida State University. Salavat (talk) 14:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ScottSpeicherMemorial.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No FoP for sculptures. — Ирука¹³ 11:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I read the section correctly, pictures of statues are not copyright free??? Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 12:17, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only those statues that are not in the public domain. — Ирука¹³ 12:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flg off 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

blocked user. File from blurbstory.com. I suspect that same problem with his other uploading: File:Insas.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 11:33, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miklós Ligeti.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no source of publication, its date. No author. — Ирука¹³ 11:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Motoi Sakuraba.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at request of uploader Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lil Tay, child rapper.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This file was only used under the assumption that Lil Tay was dead. Since it is not confirmed as of right now, it doesn't have a valid reason to be a file at the moment. B3251 (talk) 15:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if she was dead, she was such a public figure that a free image could exist, and probably does. As it turns out, she isn't. I have removed this from the article. Black Kite (talk) 17:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She probably didn't die. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 18:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Sorry, accidentally closed discussion. Reverted. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 19:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. –Davey2010^Talk 22:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I was under the assumption that she was dead when this was uploaded. Bremps... 23:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NineKwans FamilyTree.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

even thumbnails are not free to use. No sources for thumbnails are given Estopedist1 (talk) 17:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maroshi School inside.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing for this file seems suspect. We don't know if "Maroshi Online" is actually the uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 18:21, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maroshi school.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing for this file seems suspect. We don't know if "Maroshi Online" is actually the uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence of permission can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:56, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Czech Republic national football team logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 August 21. FASTILY 01:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Czech Republic national football team logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Finland national ice hockey team logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 August 21. FASTILY 01:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finland national ice hockey team logo.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Westminster Dragoons officers' capbadge (pre-2006).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Crown copyright applies, unless it can be proven this was made pre-1972. —Matr1x-101 _{(Ping me when replying)} {_{user page} ^{(@ commons)} - _talk} 19:57, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless evidence date of first use can be established. Salavat (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ajax Amsterdam.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 August 21. FASTILY 01:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ajax Amsterdam.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mariya Takeuchi - Plastic Love 1985.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus -FASTILY 01:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I believe, the uploader is unaware that the (other) image of the same original 1985 release was deleted per another FFD discussion. Not all song articles display original releases (just because they exist as such). As determined before, this cover art still is extraneous and unneeded. I don't see how it is any more significant than the 2021 reissue cover, honestly, no matter how "different" it looks. George Ho (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kommentar I'm actively working on improving this page (it's currently in my sandbox, where I tend to do this sort of stuff) but I think the cover art actually does matter here. The reissue art is just that - a reissue. The song charted in Japan upon release, and I think it's independently notable for that reason. I'm not wedded to having both, but I think it would be a disservice to the song's story to not include both given how utterly unusual its chart history is (having charted in the 80s, and then in the 2010s). I can't think of anything really like it in modern times, but including only the image for a re-release by the same artist 35 years after the original came out just doesn't seem like the right approach. The 2021 re-release art, for what it's worth, is independently notable because of just how important the image was to the song's viral success - there have been quite a few articles written about this. Toa Nidhiki05 20:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, the original release was less successful than most recent reissue one. I don't see how the sandbox version would help justify use of the 1985 image that was deleted previously. (Maybe you can create a sample of one of recordings, either original or remix. Oh, and MP3 is allowed here.) George Ho (talk) 20:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The 1985 and 2021 versions are identical, except the 2021 has the original album mix while the 1985 one has a remixed version. Toa Nidhiki05 01:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you said just now can be illustrated by an audio sample or just text alone. The original 1985 cover art displays just the singer's name and song title and may be unnecessary. IMO The cover art doesn't illustrate what you just said, unfortunately. George Ho (talk) 04:38, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep But might I make a suggestion to swap where the images are placed in the infobox. Part of the infobox image's purpose is to indicate to the reader that they have arrived at the correct page. I agree with George that the 2021 reissue cover is certainly more recognizeable, because it matches the artwork used in the YouTube video(s) which made the song popular. It also charted higher in 2021 than in 1985. That said, I think the 1985 artwork is still important from a historical perspective (it charted back then too!), so it should be the "alternative artwork" at the bottom of the infobox. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 19:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changes made per your suggestion. George Ho (talk) 21:39, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Australia national ice hockey team logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2023 August 21. FASTILY 01:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australia national ice hockey team logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.