Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Yemi Davids

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 17:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Yemi Davids

Fails NPOV, possible conflict of interest. There are some questionable statements. “When he finished school, he felt the Holy Spirit calling him to continue the fellowship in Lagos.” “He is a sought after speaker highly gifted in practical teachings in the area of Divine Wisdom for Life.” Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 21:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Originally tagged as G11, denied by User:Ivanvector. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete draft biography per WP:BLPDELETE due to the entire page being substantially of poor quality, containing unsourced / poorly sourced and/or promotional material. —Alalch E. 02:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLPDELETE. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:37, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Sourced. Looks free of actual BLP violations. This is a common enough looking draft biography for a plausibly notable person. SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Needs rejecting if submitted. Notability has already been reviewed; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yemi Davids, which deleted it from article space. Does not need deleting from draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon: i've rejected it based on this comment. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 21:20, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I forgot to add that I conflict of interest to my page but that has been added. So if I need to change anything else I will gladly take your feedback. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reid Carney (talk • contribs) 20:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep G13 will deal with it if it isn't improved. That it fails NPOV is not a reason to delete a draft.-- Pawnkingthree (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Biographies of living persons need to adhere to NPOV, which entails lack of strong bias in either direction, and this page has serious promocruft (and at least one fake reference). —Alalch E. 01:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: No reason to delete. It may be improved and considered for reintroduction into mainspace, or it may disappear to G13 and be forgot about. Either way, it's not (currently) a problem. silvia (BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within) 01:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.