Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2007 November 1

Image:JRHarrison.jpg

says both copyright, used with permission, and PD - what's correct? Calliopejen1 00:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JNS1.JPG

says pd-self but sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JNS.JPG

says pd-self, but sourced to copyrighted website Calliopejen1 01:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jackbodenhonor.jpg

looks like a scan of a copyrighted news article Calliopejen1 01:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope it's a scan from an old American Pigeon Journal (APJ). This now defunct magazine has been out of print for many years. The picture is public domain. Sting_au | Talk 09:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the source is out of print doesn't make it public domain. Mangostar (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it can't be {{PD-self}}, it must be {{PD-old}} for example..--OsamaK (talk) 09:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Beatnik.jpg

"with express permission" sounds more like {{db-i3}} than {{PD-release}}. Source link, [1], is now dead, and the archived versions at [2] contain no notice of copyright release. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 01:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:VLC Vista.png

I‌ think it's copyrighted screenshot too. OsamaK 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the video being played is almost certainly non-free. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 03:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good lord. Well, I hope what I have just done satisfies. --TV-VCR watch 13:43, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Vista GUI widgets and window decorations are still technically non-free, though they might be argued to be de minimis. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 17:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The screenshot has been changed to address the issue of copyright (whatever video was shown playing in it has been changed to show no video - I would prefer a copyright free clip being shown instead though - for example a shot from Steal_This_Film). Also screenshots are well used on Wikipedia and don't appear to be infringing copyright on all the other instances Monads (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a screenshot of a GPL 2.0 licenced product, I thought screenshots of free software automatically were covered under GPL, (and thus GFDL,) as a derivative work -- RoninBK _{T C} 00:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, uploader has uploaded a fixed version, Thanks TV :)--OsamaK 17:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as reviewed. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dd NguyenKhanh.jpg

"permission given by http://ngothelinh.150m.com/ for Free License" sounds more like {{db-i3}} than {{GFDL}}. No OTRS record of this permission. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 03:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jones Green Apple Soda.JPG

Only the copyright status of the Jones Soda label is indicated. There is no indication of the copyright status of the photo itself. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jonesthanksgiving.jpg

Only the copyright status of the Jones Soda label is indicated. There is no indication of the copyright status of the photo itself. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 04:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jedinice.JPG

Unclear from the summary if the uploader actually created this image. Rette tast 08:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stolen from here: [3]. Direct link: [4] Speedy deleted. --Dijxtra 10:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:722966_356x237.jpg

looks like a publicity photo. Uploaders only contribution Rette tast 08:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sorin_C_Bojin.jpg

looks like a puplicity photo Rette tast 09:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSCN0732.JPG

The image page needs to feature the "pui" template (not discursive comments by uploader & other users re: my objection in placing the template in the first place). That template should not have been deleted (same objections pertain); the image page itself should not be protected; it needs further work. The image page needs better description, clearer templates, and should be more like Image:Nobel medal dsc06171.jpg (though I still dispute the "public domain in the U.S." template tag there; see Image talk:Nobel medal_dsc06171.jpg#Nobel Prize (R) Medals and above that sec.). Both of these images have current entry in Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Nobel Prize (R) Medal images. See also Talk:Nobel Prize and Talk:Nobel Prize in Physics, as well as Nobel Prize in Physics#The award, for comparisons. GFDL-compatible licenses do not seem appropriate for either of these images, whose "non-free content" is still disputed. --NYScholar 10:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC) --Updated. --NYScholar 11:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC) [added link to talk page sec. for convenience of others. --NYScholar 01:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Not actually tagged. PUI is unlikely to be the right venue in any case. Angus McLellan (Talk) 11:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:President Steamboat.jpg

Image is "Courtesy Gateway Riverboat Cruises" so is not National Park Service US Government Public Domain. — SEWilco 14:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Verified as "Courtesy Gateway Riverboat Cruises", probably not public domain. -kotra 21:22, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]