Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 December 19
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 19
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. I find it really hard to swallow the idea that an organization would release its logo into the public domain, and in the absence of an OTRS filing, I am left with no evidence of permission. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- organizational logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be the (c) holder thereof Skier Dude (talk 04:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note; uploader has been informed on his talk page that WP:OTRS will be needed to prove the claims of permission. Skier Dude (talk 01:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RothTV14-1980.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Work of artist Jack Roth, no link between artist & uploader - unlikely it has been released as PD Skier Dude (talk 05:13, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mukti Bandhan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not uploaders work, see image watermark Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:21, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: The image in question was uploaded to replace an existing free one at the same filename by an editor who was well warned about his bad images. I've reverted to the previous image, so this discussion is moot at this time. DMacks (talk) 15:57, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ActorVijayimage.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tineye match- http://narumugai.com/?p=18167 Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:31, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bambang-pamungkas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claimed this as own work but he/she listed that the source is Google. Also, the user is blocked indefinitely due to copyright violations. MT (talk) 16:56, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Atep.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claimed this as own work but the image seems to be taken from Goal.com article. MT (talk) 17:52, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Firman-utina3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claimed this as own work but the image seems to be taken from Republika article. Republika is an Indonesian newspaper, so I believe the image is copyrighted. MT (talk) 17:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Boazsolossa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claimed this as own work but the image seems to be taken from Bolanews article. Bolanews.com is the official website of Bola, an Indonesian sports tabloid, so I believe the image is copyrighted. MT (talk) 17:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Arifsuyono.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image copyrighted by Reuters, see this news article. MT (talk) 18:01, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Maman-besar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- An image of footballer Maman Abdurahman from his profile page in his club's official website. MT (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Zulkifli.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is a copyright tag on the image which indicates that the copyright belong to a website called Ongisnade. The image came from this article on that website. MT (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Okto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader claimed this as own work but the image seems to be taken from ChannelNewsAsia article. MT (talk) 18:16, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:06, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Football badge, doubt uploader is the copyright holder. Acather96 (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Image copyrighted by Yahoo, see this news article. MT (talk) 18:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kieran Nugent.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- what to do with all the uploaded files from this (blocked) user? The old ones do not have a source given. He also seem to have several cameras but not many completely different. Is authorship and {own} usually assumed in en.wikipedia for these old uploads? Cheers Saibo (Δ) 18:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. The explanation provided by the uploader seems reasonable enough, and I have no reason not to believe them. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:42, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This sure looks like a professional photo; something tells me 21st Century Greenstuff didn't take this photo in 1971. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the compliment on my photography skills. Actually I did take this photograph along with several others. Frank Farrell and I had been personal friends and fellow bass players for several years and I used to spend time (when not gigging myself) at Supertramp's rehearsals in their basement flat, off Sussex Gardens in Paddington - Farrell and I were sharing a flat in West Acton at the time. The other photograph of Farrell on the same article was also my work, taken in Zurich but before I bought my first SLR camera. The lads in the band were so impressed with the photographs I took that several were considered for the album artwork (but didn't make the cut in the end). 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 20:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.