Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 6

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 6, 2014.

First Battle of Picardy

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move 1st Battle of Picardy to First Battle of Picardy. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article has been written which should have this title (mistakenly called 1st Battle of Picardy by me), so this needs to be deleted so the page can be moved. This redirect is circular, incidentally. TheLongTone (talk) 19:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See discussion below.TheLongTone (talk) 19:47, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

1st Picardy

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 13:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem to be a particularly likely term to use as an abbreviation of title article has been moved to (1st Battle of Picardy) TheLongTone (talk) 18:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history I left this: I started an article First Battle of Picardy but it redirects to Race to the Sea or goes to a page titled 1st Picardy, which is the abbreviation in the Race to the Sea template. I've tried to edit the redirect following Wikipedia:Redirect and only managed to bugger things up more.


The new article on the 1st Battle of Picardy is a good start - but I believe it should be called the First Battle of Picardy (for consistency). Then, the redirect can be fixed to point to this newly created article, and a link added to the Race to the Sea#Battle of Picardy, 22–26 September article. MWadwell (talk) 20:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See above, there's a redirect in the way.TheLongTone (talk) 23:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fryderyk Shopin

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, keep, delete, keep, and keep, respectively. --BDD (talk) 13:10, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo. � (talk) 08:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Chrome 1

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. After well over a month of discussion and a few weeks since the last comment, I find a weak consensus to delete. --BDD (talk) 13:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The version numbers are not particularly significant. TheChampionMan1234 08:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 12:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Taïwan

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. This has been relisted over a month without additional comment, so relisting it again seems pointless. Thryduulf (talk) 13:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not especially French and implausible typo TheChampionMan1234 00:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rich, in what sense is FORRED being "abused"? Such redirects are often deleted with clear consensus. Is this standard really being "abused," or do you just disagree with it? --BDD (talk) 21:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not to mention if that was ever agreed to it would mean that we would need to remove WP:R#DELETE criterion 8 since FORRED is basically a reiteration of that.--67.68.22.129 (talk) 03:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 12:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hert

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. bd2412 T 01:26, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

This redirect page links to no misspellings of "Hertz" but to two correct uses of "Hert". : Noyster (talk), 10:49, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

They are supposed to be out of bed, you blithering idiot

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedural close — already deleted as G7 [non-admin closure] � (talk) 15:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Random quote from a Harry Potter film. Unlikely search term. gobonobo + c 06:22, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:RfU

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion as a helpful and logical target. NAC. The Whispering Wind (talk) 01:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what this should be. - TheChampionMan1234 04:28, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

猶太人大屠殺

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This topic has no affiliation for any of these languages. - TheChampionMan1234 04:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

COPY (command)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to copy (command) [non-admin closure] � (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is the best target for this. DOS is far from the only computer to have a copy command. I'd say copy and paste functionality seen in modern GUIs is a more likely target. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Listcruft

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Improper redirect outside of reader-space. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: XNRs to Wikipedia essays with limited acceptance; I tried to locate an article that would mention attitude towards excessive lists in established style guidelines, but apparently we have nothing on this topic. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 08:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete XNR to essay not meaningful to the readership, as it is for the editorship. Further, crufty lists are not the sole province of Wikipedia, so the essay is not meaningful to other circumstances. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 05:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tomatœ

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible typo, and this does not mean "Tomato" in any language. - TheChampionMan1234 03:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_August_6&oldid=1138579453"