Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 18, 2019.

C19H15Cl2O4

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C19H15Cl2O4 was created by mistake: formula of Rebamipide is C19H15ClN2O4. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C19H15Cl2O4. I propose to delete it. (C19H15ClN2O4 is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 23:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A mistake is not vandalism so G3 doesn't seem to apply. Also the "vandalism" was added by the above anon along with a g3 tag which I reverted. Anyway for this one assuming it's a mistake like mentioned in by the nom, then delete it. Sakura CarteletTalk 05:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Serenes Forest

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The name of a fansite that is irrelevant to the actual game and not mentioned in the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 13:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From a quick Google search for Serenes Forest, it seems that it isn't just limited to covering this one game but the Fire Emblem series as a whole. Still not sure it'd be worth keeping as a redirect (to this page or any page related to Fire Emblem) though. Sakura CarteletTalk 06:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Magic Seal

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 3#Magic Seal

Fire EMblem

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely typo for a game title. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:36, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Magic in the Fire Emblem series

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and refine to the Common elements section. --BDD (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Little mention of this in the article. WP:NOTGUIDE style cruft. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C16H16Cl3N5O

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C16H16Cl3N5O was created by mistake: formula of PSB-10 is C16H14Cl3N5O. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C16H16Cl3N5O. I propose to delete it. (C16H14Cl3N5O is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 22:58, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Center for Brain and Cognition

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect has two problems: the first is that it's pointing at the director of the UCSD Center for Brain and Cognition, as opposed to the center itself (article does not exist) or its parent organization (UCSD). The second is that there is at least one other such-titled center of roughly equal prominence, the CBC at UPF Barcelona. I would suggest that as neither of these centers has articles right now, this should be converted to a redlink for lack of a clearly suitable target. signed, Rosguill talk 19:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware of the Barcelona center when I created the redirect page. The CBC at UCSD is essentially VS Ramachandran's research group. Neither of the two CBCs seems to be an "official" research center of its university. Neither university article mentions its CBC. I don't see enough news coverage for either to make it notable enough for a standalone article. Perhaps a disambiguation page that mentions both CBCs and includes some hyperlinks would be better than a simple redirect? HouseOfChange (talk) 01:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, if it's really the case that neither center is notable at all and that the UCSD CBC is just Ramachandran's work group, then maybe leaving it as is is the best option. signed, Rosguill talk 02:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As for its being Ramachandran's work group, there is a very funny description of a meeting there near the end of the 2009 New Yorker profile of him. I searched en-wiki for the term, and several articles mention the UCSD CBC, including the lead section of VS Ramachandran. So I would support leaving the redirect. HouseOfChange (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:57, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Democrazia Cristian

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 6#Democrazia Cristian

Stripe graphic

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Too vague, no indication that these refer to climate diagrams. signed, Rosguill talk 18:13, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep:
-- Stripe graphic is now recited in the article and also in:
- https://lifehacker.com/see-how-climate-change-has-affected-your-area-with-warm-1835612836
- https://climaterealitychicago.com/show-your-stripes/
-- warming stripe graphic or "warming stripe" graphic is used in:
- the inventor's tweet: https://twitter.com/ed_hawkins/status/1140622501917147136
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-energy-202/2019/06/18/the-energy-202-a-federal-watchdog-is-investigating-trump-administration-s-decisions-on-utah-monument/5d07b4c8a7a0a4586bb2db10/
- https://www.mytwintiers.com/news-cat/local-news/check-out-the-change-in-new-york-and-pennsylvanias-climate-on-show-your-stripes-day/
-- "Stripe diagram" is based on Wikimedia Commons categories Climate change diagrams, Global warming diagrams, etc.
-- The graphic was invented by a climate scientist to visualize specific data (temperatures) for a specific purpose (global warming). The two broadernot "vague" terms you list above simply don't yet have a separate and broader Wikipedia article. —RCraig09 (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

2019 J.League Cup / Copa Sudamericana Championship Final

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 17:29, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not really something that wouldn't be looked at. HawkAussie (talk) 00:58, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:20, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Upper Village

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz talk 18:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous term, based on internet search results the most well-known "Upper Village" is in Whistler, BC, but it's also a moniker used in several other locations. I would suggest deletion and letting the search engine do its work due to the lack of a clear primary target. signed, Rosguill talk 22:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps create a disambiguation page? Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I considered that, but it is further complicated by the fact that "Upper Village" is often merely a subtopic of an actual article--we don't have much in the way of full articles on these subjects (and at least a few seem to be missing entirely). My advocating for deletion is more on the principle of not surprising people looking for one of these places by dropping them in an article that is only marginally even about the other ones. signed, Rosguill talk 02:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Way too generic a name. I agree that it's not a good candidate for disambiguation, having done some searching to see if we could support it. --BDD (talk) 17:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Italy 2026

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 6#Italy 2026

Mediacid

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 27#Mediacid

Cosmogenic

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 17:22, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Would cosmogenic nuclide be a more appropriate target? The current redirect is to a section with a hatnote pointing to that article, and I am not aware of another possible primary topic for the term cosmogenic (at least in this broad context). ComplexRational (talk) 18:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 22:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Любе

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 22:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Cyrillic in the redirect is a misspelling of the subject's name in Russian, which is Любэ. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 22:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Implausible typo. James-the-Charizard (talk) 04:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per above - typo. –Dave | Davey2010Talk 15:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. People who speak Russian likely won't make this typo, and people who don't speak Russian will likely come here via copy/paste. Even if they come here by entering the letters individually, they'll probably use something like Character Map or a list of Russian letters, and they'll copy letters one-by-one, and if they're taking the effort to do that, they'll notice if they make a mistake, since е and э are quite different, unlike э and з, or ш and щ. Either way, it's highly unlikely that anglophones will make this mistake. Nyttend (talk) 02:12, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C34H52N4O4

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:59, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C34H52N4O4 was created by mistake: formula of Protoporphyrinogen IX is C34H38N4O4. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C34H52N4O4. I propose to delete it. (C34H38N4O4 is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 22:27, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Drill DOzer

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 26#Drill DOzer

A room full of monkeys

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 14:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:THE. The phrase is not mentioned in the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:38, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oh Great

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SURPRISE. The exclamation point in the redirected title makes it somewhat different than this generic phrase. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep as a plausible and seemingly unambiguous misspelling. Might be surprising, but doesn't impede navigation or cause harm in any other way that I know of. Geolodus (talk) 08:16, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as plausible. If I hear someone named this, I would think it's formatted "Oh Great" instead of "Oh! great". -- Tavix (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Tavix. The exclamation point in the redirected title makes it quite implausible: there's no way we'd use an exclamation point like this if it weren't part of a name, and we shouldn't expect readers to know that it's there. Nyttend (talk) 02:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mad (Tv Series)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RDAB. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Smells Like Teen Spirit\

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UNNATURAL. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Cat Daddy games

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No such list on the target page. The primary page this originally redirected to, Cat Daddy Games, has also been redirected. Lordtobi () 19:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kid ICarus

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PANDORA. Unnecessary as Wikipedia search already corrects such errors. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't think Pandora's Box was opened either, but this is completely unnecessary, Wikipedia search capabilities render it useless. James-the-Charizard (talk) 21:27, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Eurovision Song Contest Asia 2018/ESCA 2019

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the show is "Eurovision Asia Song Contest" with the colloquial initilism "EASC". The contest has never been officially titled "Eurovision Song Contest Asia" nor has the initialism "ESCA" ben used. Both are unlikely search terms, especially in combination with years the contest will not take place in. Lordtobi () 18:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Countries in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of these countries have announced their intent to participate in the Eurovision Asia Song Contest, so any such redirect is misleading. Lordtobi () 18:51, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Solomon Islands in the Eurovision Song Contest

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:57, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Solomon Islands do not (and can not) participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. The country intends to take part in the spin-off show Eurovision Asia Song Contest (which has yet to happen), but a separate redirect for that exists, making this redirect wrong and misleading. Lordtobi () 18:48, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The, Or the Critical Journal Edinburgh Review

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense redirect and apparently a typo for The Edinburgh Review, or The Critical Journal. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

C12H16FNO4S

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7. I created this redirect in error. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C12H16FNO4S was created by mistake: formula of Polmacoxib is C18H16FNO4S. I have not found molecule in enWiki with formula C12H16FNO4S. I propose to delete it. (C18H16FNO4S is in the list of redirs to create by bot so I didn't create it manually.) Gyimhu (talk) 10:21, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anicotti

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A stock standard "normal villager" character who isn't even a major character of the game. Not mentioned in the target page, overly crufty. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

K.K.'s Hidden Songs

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Veers into pure WP:GAMEGUIDE territory. Not mentioned in target article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 05:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Animal Crossing Revolution

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 14:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody refers to the Wii as "Revolution" anymore, especially when searching for a specific game. Implausible. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:43, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Animal Crossing Wii (working title)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz talk 18:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation doesn't make much sense anymore as it has had a real title for a decade. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:42, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Let's go to the city

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 04:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as overly vague phrase to refer to this one target. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Animal Cross:Wild World

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:55, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:UNNATURAL, the double typo renders it overly implausible. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:35, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Animal crossing review

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 26#Animal crossing review