Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 29

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 29, 2019.

Debasement (knighthood)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:53, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was created by an article rename (by me). "Debasement" was just an error. It has never had the meaning claimed here. Leaving the redirect is a potential source of confusion since it suggests that the term has some legitimacy. There are no incoming links in article space. Dan Bloch (talk) 18:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Like Nastya Vlog

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 7#Like Nastya Vlog

Finnish National Agency for Education

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:36, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information (not even mentioned) on the subject. Not mentioned in Ministry of Education and Culture (Finland) either so that's not a good retarget. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Rest Of Us(album)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from implausible typo. It's always possible for any disambiguated title to be mistyped in a form that drops the space between the topic's name and the disambiguator, but we don't need a comprehensive program of always having a redirect to every disambiguated title from a spacing-error version of the same title, and there's no compelling reason why this album has a unique need for something that most other titles with parentheses in them don't have. Bearcat (talk) 16:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kloreen, buryum

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Highly implausible, look like phonetic jokes and are too dissimilar to their targets to be useful in searches. Their creator was indefinitely blocked for creating abusive redirects. ComplexRational (talk) 15:20, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LEad

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While this misspelling is possible when holding the shift key, this deserves no preferential treatment to billions of other similar typos. The search engine corrects this automatically, and this has no use in linking, so delete. ComplexRational (talk) 15:19, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kalcium

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As the misspelling is the initial letter, it seems less likely that this would happen compared to a misspelling elsewhere in the word. For this reason, I'm not sure if this is redirect is really necessary or helpful. ComplexRational (talk) 15:16, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Calium

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where this should point, it could also be a misspelling of kalium (potassium), caliumi (a minor planet), cilium (an organelle), or a bunch of other things. I would suggest deletion for the lack of a clear target. ComplexRational (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alliminuim

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At least three spelling errors makes this seem highly implausible, even when mashing keys. Relisting individually because its batch RfD was closed as no consensus. ComplexRational (talk) 15:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Asstatine

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. WP:SNOW -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly a joke or vandalism, especially considering that the creator was blocked indefinitely for creating abusive redirects. There were several delete !votes for this one at the batch RfD, but the batch was closed as no consensus, so relisting and again suggesting deletion. ComplexRational (talk) 15:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

United Laboratories

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Anyone is welcome to overwrite the redirect with an article. -- Tavix (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The well-known United Laboratories pharmaceutical company should have an article on its own instead of being a mere redirect to its founder. Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

🅱️

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to ABO blood group system. (non-admin closure) ComplexRational (talk) 14:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Current target doesn't make sense. Could be retargetted to ABO blood group system, as that's where 🅰️ and 🅾️ currently point to. Not a very active user (talk) 10:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tacoma

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 7#Tacoma

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pseudo-namespace cross-namespace redirect; unused (1 view in 90 days). –xenotalk 06:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:PCP

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. It does not follow standard convention for redirects of wikiproject banners Magioladitis (talk) 07:22, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 04:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Innisfail Evening Advocate

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 7#Innisfail Evening Advocate

Football.london

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. No further comments after the relist, and no consensus prior to the relist. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SPAM The Banner talk 14:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a news source without a page/section in article space, so no way for reader to judge veracity/authority of its news articles. I would argue that redirecting allows reader to distinguish between credible news sources, and someone's hobby website. Bogger (talk) 14:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --BDD (talk) 15:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Auditor of the College Historical Society

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 13:19, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IRRELEVANT The Banner talk 14:09, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Octyldodecanol

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was moot/withdrawn. The redirect has been replaced with an article. ChemNerd (talk) 12:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The chemical compound octyldodecanol is not mentioned at alcohol. Out of the literally millions of chemical compounds classified as alcohols, there is no reason to single out just this one to be redirected to the page about this class of chemicals. ChemNerd (talk) 17:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:57, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Montreal Screwjob (Dark Side of the Ring)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary redirect, there is already a link to Dark Side of the Ring in the Montreal Screwjob article Marcocapelle (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's common to redirect episode names to the series they're from, this does not break any kind of rule so I don't see how deleting these are helpful to anyone.★Trekker (talk) 10:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:56, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Montreal Screwjob (WWE Confidential)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary redirect, there is already a link to WWE Confidential in the Montreal Screwjob article. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's common to redirect episode names to the series they're from, this does not break any kind of rule so I don't see how deleting these are helpful to anyone.★Trekker (talk) 10:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete. Though "Montreal Screwjob" is mentioned in the article, specifically the subject at Montreal Screwjob, the subject pertaining to an episode of the target article's subject called "Montreal Screwjob" is not mentioned in the target article. At the present time, readers attempting to find information about the episode will probably be disappointed. Steel1943 (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:56, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete per Steel1943. A formal episode list would probably change my mind, assuming "Montreal Screwjob" or something very similar is an actual episode title. --BDD (talk) 15:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shawn Michaels vs Bret Hart: WWE's Greatest Rivalries

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. No prejudice against recreation as an article or to somewhere it's mentioned. -- Tavix (talk) 21:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

it looks like this is the title of a book or film, but there is nothing about it in the Montreal Screwjob article. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There should be. It's the name of a documentary film which focuses on Bret Hart, Shawn Michaels and the Monstreal Screwjob. Also, just so you know, I'm planing on turning most these redirects into articles one day.★Trekker (talk) 10:17, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:56, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Geirrendour

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A purported name of a Norse giant listed in some old reference works as a father of the nine waves. But the name is spurious and presumably either invented or grounded in some misunderstanding. It looks kind of like a corrupt version of Geirröðr although that isn't the father of the waves. In any case, a long time ago I turned this into a redirect to a page which included pseudo-entities like this. But it no longer includes Geirrendour so the redirect is no longer fitting and should probably be deleted. Haukur (talk) 22:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

DSFL

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. -- Tavix (talk) 21:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An internet search would not suggest that this initialism primarily refers to the current target. I would suggest either redirecting to Ford Motor Company#Ford Motor Company Fund, as their Driving Skills for Life program is the top Google result for DSFL, disambiguation, or deletion (as none of the potential targets appear to be strongly associated with this initialism in usage in RS). signed, Rosguill talk 21:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

obviously, being the user who created this redirect, i don't agree with this change. in incognito mode, for me, the venue is the top hit. Playground Twist (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Alas, even in incognito mode, Google has made an effort to localize results in a way that makes it less reliable an instrument for these purposes. The Ford program dominates results in incognito mode for me; I'm in the US, and bet you're in the UK... --BDD (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:55, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Disambiguate I don't see a really easy way to weigh the relative importance or notability of the two topics raised here. Since the Ford program just gets a mention in a much larger article, we can't really rely on page views. I just created Driving Skills for Life, so maybe after some time with a disambiguation page, we can reassess. --BDD (talk) 15:14, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:AnimationProject

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners. Magioladitis (talk) 07:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:54, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Animation Project

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:43, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused for many years. It does not follow the standard naming convention for redirects of wikiproject banners. Magioladitis (talk) 07:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template talk:ChristianityWikiProject/sandbox

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Part of an incomplete move. Magioladitis (talk) 07:13, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Medstat

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, I would suggest deletion unless an appropriate justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 07:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • On the discussion page, I provided articles that shows the path by which Medstat was purchased by Thomson Reuters to become Thomson Medstat, and then sold to become Truven Health Analytics, which then was aquired by IBM to become IBM Watson Health. So, rather than put an article on the Medstat page, I just used a redirect. Hoshisabi (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:44, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:50, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I did another internet search to see if I could verify Hoshisabi's claim, and I'm now under the impression that there are in fact many different medical companies named Medstat [1], [2], [3]. Of these first three that I found, it's not clear that any of them have ever had any affiliation with Thomson Reuters, Truven Health Analytics or IBM Watson Health. As such, I don't think a redirect is appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 01:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hamari Adhuri Kahani ( song)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good redirect. We already have Hamari Adhuri Kahani (song). -- CptViraj (📧) 03:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_September_29&oldid=921100138"