Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 15, 2022.

Viserys

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 22#Viserys

Aerial art

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 26#Aerial art

Locally small category

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and retarget.

These should lead to the same target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 08:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Subobject#Definitions notes that "locally small" is ambiguous ("this clashes with a different usage of the term locally small, namely that there is a set of morphisms between any two objects") and indeed our Morphism article does use the term but I can't work out with which meaning. I'm surprised that the term is not ambiguous with something outside mathematics but it doesn't appear to be. Thryduulf (talk) 09:37, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:13, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:07, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per the comments.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 20:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not sure why you relisted that again. From the comments so far, people have suggested a few things, introducing other redirects, etc, which is is somewhat outside the scope of the decision at hand. But nobody is suggesting to merge the two links as the original editor was proposing. PatrickR2 (talk) 04:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Joe Trudeau

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Joseph Trudeau. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 10:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible misnomer for the subject. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more relist for a stronger opinion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Foreign language redirects to Belarus

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep Respublika Belarus and Byelarossia; delete Belarussi, Belorusi, and Bielaruś.. -- Tavix (talk) 00:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per WP:FORRED foreign language redirects should only exist where there is affinity between the language and the target, but there is none between Belarus and any of Maltese, Slovenian, Catalan, Indonesian or Azerbaijani/Uzbekistani respectively. Although "Byelarossia" is tagged as {{R from alternative name}} I'm not seeing any uses in an English language context. Thryduulf (talk) 16:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Respublika Belarus, which wasn´t created as the Azerbaijani or Uzbek version, but as the official long form of the name in Russian, as given in the CIA Factbook or e.g. here. No opinion yet on the others, I haven´t looked at them so I don´t know if the nomination is more correct for those or not. Fram (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Respublika Belarus per Fram, transliteration of the official name mentioned in the article. Next best is Byelarossia, a transliteration of "White Russia" in Russian. Others should probably go. —Kusma (talk) 18:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One participant thought 3 out of 5 of the entries should probably be deleted, and another participant didn't go through 4 of the entries. However both are in agreement that one of them should be kept.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:34, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Тайфун Майсак

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 22#Тайфун Майсак

Cossart, Pennsylvania

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 23#Cossart, Pennsylvania

Fox Baltimore

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to WBFF. Closing a day early under SNOW as a simple mistake correction. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The station redirects to an NBC station in Philadelphia,which means this redirect is misleading both ways. Danubeball (talk) 16:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

7:46

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep. There is no reasonable possibility that a consensus for deletion will form at this point. BD2412 T 18:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why this redirect is necessary. The actual time was 9:29 and I haven't seen 7:46 used as a symbol associated with police like 8:46, so I don't see why this redirect is necessary. The redirect was created during the time when it was incorrectly believed that Chauvin kneeled on Floyd for seven minutes and 46 seconds. It is now known that the correct time was nine minutes and 29 seconds, as proven by body cam footage. It also isn't typically associated with police brutality like 8:46. 8:46 is commonly associated with police brutality and the murder of George Floyd, so that redirect is acceptable despite being a misnomer. The 7:46 redirect is a misnomer that isn't used commonly and should not be associated with the murder of George Floyd, and most people aren't doing so. I think this redirect should be deleted. CriticalMaster95 (talk) 15:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dupont´s lark

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete as to all except Anton Bernolák´s Chapel. BD2412 T 14:25, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible/WP:UNNATURAL; the properly apostrophised versions exist, and the pages were never located at these titles. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 13#List of Sao Paulo´s sister towns. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tomm

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay 💬 08:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems odd to have a redirect to an acronym at this capitalization. I propose to delete this and move Tomm (disambiguation) here instead. BD2412 T 06:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

UNIHD

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 24#UNIHD

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of notable English palindromic phrases. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:27, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While there are some famous palindromes listed in the article, these are not listed there and have not seemingly been for a little bit. TartarTorte 00:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.