Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Felix Natalo/Archive

Felix Natalo

Felix Natalo (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Report date November 6 2009, 22:51 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

Mangingisda99 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Rvr707 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
124.217.31.65 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

1K Years (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Dar book (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Jamesatienza (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
124.104.198.133 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Evidence submitted by Shannon Rose

Hi, these are users making similar edits apparently to whitewash a duly-sourced article. Identical edits to blank and repeatedly insert unnotable "awards" intended for the organization and not for the subject is what aroused my suspicion. After repeated history of almost everyone editing in favor of the subject and his org turning out to be a sock in the end (please see Petersantos and Dar book), I certainly don't wish to spare recently perma-blocked user Felix Natalo from being investigated. Please compare the following edits: 1 2 3 4 5 6. Thank you and more power! – Shannon Rose ^Talk 22:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )

Current status –

Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below. Requested by Shannon Rose ^Talk 22:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Felix Natalo (talk · contribs) Confirmed as:
- Mangingisda99 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- The Editor's Pen (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 1K Years (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 124.217.31.65 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Myironbull (talk · contribs) is Confirmed as:
- Vladimir.susic (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Rvr707 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Article also protected. Brandon (talk) 11:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note Blocked/tagged all confirmed accounts. The IP's edit was from 4 days ago, blocking doesn't seem necessary. JamieS93 19:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

All sockpuppets blocked and tagged except IP. ceranthor 19:41, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.