Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Krajoyn/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Krajoyn

Krajoyn (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

10 January 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Picked up where Heronarcet (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) left off back in September. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 No sleepers immediately visible. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20 January 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Kiaator is run-of-the-mill Krajoyn, whereas Ineedisin is a bit trickier. The account focuses on Spain-related topics, and the very first edit is a typical casualty figure. What really makes me think this is Krajoyn, however, is the adamant refusal to participate in talk page discussion, is spite of several reminders, and edit summaries that are either absent or restricted to Wikipedia shortcuts. Right now, he's edit-warring on several articles simultaneously, and a report has been made to WP:ANEW. CU requested for sleepers and colocation webhosts. Favonian (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed. -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:42, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

26 January 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


The first four are just knee-jerk responses to last Sunday's round. Healandn was created the day after and took up where Ineedisin left off on the Spain article. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 16:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


26 January 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Sorry CUs, but he chose to make a point. The recent edit to Roman Empire shows his current hobby: unattributed copying between Wikipedia articles. Guess he pulled a new colocation web host from his stash which needs plugging. Favonian (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


27 January 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Continuation of yesterday: copying without attribution and downright copyright violation. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 14:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


28 January 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Standard fare. The IP (no need to frown with privacy concerns – Special:DeletedContributions/81.90.188.201 is as good as a signature) is a bit unusual. I would expect one of the habitual colocation web hosts, but this resource says no. Am I not looking carefully enough? At any rate, CU requested for sleepers etc. Favonian (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed plus

Favonian, the ISP is Think Huge 1 and they deploy this VPS as can be seen at the bottom of the page. Their VPS servers are mapped here.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see. May the expense ruin him! All are blocked that could be blocked, so closing. Favonian (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


03 February 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Just soldiering on. Some old accounts being revitalized, hence CU request for sleepers and the usual colocation web hosts, of course. Favonian (talk) 12:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, and one other found: Heavesiz. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07 February 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


The first two are standard. Gativest is a bit more subtle, but the edits are poorly sourced, unexplained changes related to the old favorite: Spain vs. the Netherlands. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 21:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed to each other

 Confirmed to each other

09 March 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


It's been a long time since the last report, and in the meantime this sock has been active. Some of the usual subjects, relentless edit-warring and the characteristic aversion to talk page discussion. CU requested for the habitual colocation web hosts and possibly sleepers. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Technically indistinguishable

 Blocked and tagged
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 21:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12 March 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Usual subject areas with a focus on casualty figures and adamant refusal to discuss warnings regarding copyright violations etc. CU requested for colocation web hosts and possibly sleepers. Favonian (talk) 22:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • The two accounts are  Technically indistinguishable between themselves and are also  Technically indistinguishable from previous reported socks. Already blocked. Risker (talk) 06:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07 April 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Back in business on one of the favorite articles – complete with personalized edit summaries. CU requested for sleepers and underlying colocation webhosts. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


09 April 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Curious case. Starts out targeting articles from the turf of Dopenguins and then switches to classic Krajoyn material with a foray around an Ohio high school. Krajoyn imitating Dopenguins or vice versa; possibly one of the habitual copycats? One feels like a biologist observing primitive organisms mutating in a Petri dish. Anyhow, CU requested for truth, enlightenment, sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 16:53, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

DoganalmenteCH is  Likely Dopenguins but it should be noted that Dopenguins and Krajoyn are also using the same proxies. Gradimdis (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is  Confirmed to ChirpSk8r in the archive and is Krajoyn.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:21, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


12 April 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Flying under the radar for nearly a month, but the targeted articles all belong to the usual domain, and the strong focus on casualty figures is there. Finally, the reassuring confirmation of identity. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


13 April 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


A sock of several months' seniority, touching all the right bases. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added OCD130, an even more venerable sock – possibly a link to Krajoyn's conjectured previous existence!
Dug up a couple more from the Dominican history. They're staler than a pharaoh's mummy, but this case file is the only place to list them. Favonian (talk) 18:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

All done here. Closing.. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14 April 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


I'll let them speak for themselves. CU requested for sleepers (how can they sleep with all that noice?) and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 09:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed

26 May 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Been a long time, but finally back in well-known, broken record style. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 21:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

03 June 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Chose to sign a confession like a good sport. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts, as per usual. Favonian (talk) 21:37, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

The sleepers: Jjfoxield, Iserants, Ingooduc, Bosonal, Golanette, LiveCheerup, Concella, Hehelizrac. -- zzuuzz (talk) 23:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05 June 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Oh, just the usual. Cannaker was created 20 minutes after the last SPI case was closed. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 20:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Yup. The sleepers: Menteker, Kingeristl, JimThief, Invenvice, Capithm. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06 June 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Like yesterday: some 15 minutes after the previous case being closed, he creates a new sock. Wash, rinse, repeat. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 18:05, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:44, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07 June 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Gearing up for the weekend. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 10:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Done. A couple of sleepers. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09 June 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Quick recap of today's activities. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 00:14, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Also: Havergy (talk · contribs). -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

27 June 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


A backlog has accumulated and a CU request made for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 16:55, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed

 Inconclusive

30 July 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Been a long time since the last report, but he has not spent the time rethinking his approach to editing. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 10:11, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Done, confirmed, no obvious sleepers. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23 October 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Standard pattern: basically dormant for weeks, then into favorite topics like the Spanish American wars of independence and a (now deleted) campaign box. Account already blocked on behavioral evidence, but requesting CU for the usual web hosts and sleepers. Favonian (talk) 19:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
@ST47: Interesting. There are some Krajoyn traits like the casualty-related edits to Battle of Chacabuco and the obsessive edit-warring on British intervention in Spanish American independence. On the other hand, Krajoyn is infamously averse to talk pages while Caminoderoma has put in an appearance there. In view of the CU result, my conclusion must be that Fereson is not a Krajoyn sock, though their edits (and username) do a good job of imitating him. Favonian (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for having a look. I'll leave the lot untagged, out of uncertainty as to who the correct master is in this case. ST47 (talk) 03:51, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

30 October 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

The pages edited by this trio are in the familiar area of Latin America, especially the Dominican Republic, but Krajoyn has chosen a new approach. Now, large portions of text are being removed as copyvios, which, if correct, is not disruptive per se, but the typical Krajoyn behavior (which got him blocked, then banned in the first place) of refusing to discuss anything on talk pages manifests itself in spite of appeals such as this. Instead, he uses mile-long edit summaries as justification. The IPs are already (range-)blocked as colocation webhosts and thus CU is not asked to make the (obvious) connection, but a request is made to look for other proxies and the odd sleeper account. Favonian (talk) 16:41, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • The following accounts are  Confirmed to each other:
Natemargas was previously blocked (non-CU) as a Krajoyn sock. I have blocked the unblocked accounts without tags.
  • The above group is  Inconclusive with Fereson et.al. from the previous report. Both groups are using a different webhost, but have two (very common) useragents in common between them.  Behavioural evidence needs evaluation.
  • No comment with respect to the IPs.
-- Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Ivanvector! With the accounts blocked there is nothing more to be done, so I've closed the case. Favonian (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

31 October 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Direct continuation of yesterday's case. CU requested for colocation web hosts and sleepers. Favonian (talk) 08:30, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

04 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Harpoly was a straight continuation of the previous batch. Bavallen has abandoned the mile-long edit summaries in favor of the usual terse style, but the account's edits correlate with those of the previously blocked Slipkinfa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). CU requested for sleepers and colocation webhosts. Favonian (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

06 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Continuing similar behavior as previous socks (i.e. Corpelas), except copying & pasting from Battle of Azua and Battle of Santiago (1844) to their existing redirects. Jalen Folf (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

11 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


On a roll today! Second batch after Hiralige (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and friends, dispatched recently by zzuuzz. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 14:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Done. I picked up a couple of additional accounts earlier. -- zzuuzz (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Edit-warring to add copyvios to Roman/Italian history. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 10:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Thanks, Ivanvector! Richardkreplock is as different kind of useless from Krajoyn, but I guess that's insufficient for a block at this stage. Let's call it a day. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Continuation of yesterday's wave. CU requested for sleepers and colocation web hosts. Favonian (talk) 11:06, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
-- Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:39, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23 November 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Edits of the article Rise of Rome (diff) similar to that of Roman Empire (diff), using content from historica.fandom (read what they say in the edit summary). Archasit first edited the article with an IP (196.52.21.251) and then reverts me with the Archasit account (see history). User:Mezzetto who edited Roman Empire was banned as a sock of User:Krajoyn. It looks straightforward to me. T8612 (talk) 12:46, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 December 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Good tidings I bring to all ye merry CheckUsers. Santa dumped a Krajoyn sock down the chimney. No question about the identity, but CU nevertheless requested for sleepers and web hosts. Favonian (talk) 19:42, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

04 January 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Usual subjects, usual friendly style. CU requested for sleepers and web hosts. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

11 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

A few hours after sock Hanls was blocked, Breslif was created. They reverted an edit in Dominican Republic here: [1], which had undone most of Hanls' edit: [2], with the edit summary "moron". IamNotU (talk) 13:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

13 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Targets article previously edited by Krajoyn socks and there is the characteristic emphasis on Spain vs. the Netherlands. Also the typical aversion to meaningful comments when reverting a trial balloon. Mandatory CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 17:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
All blocked without tags. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:46, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

14 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Perfectly standard Krajoyn clones. CU requested for sleeper sweep and proxy-plugging. Favonian (talk) 22:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

16 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


More of the same. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

17 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

As usual, he didn't take kindly to yesterday's round-up. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 06:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
This case is being reviewed by JJMC89 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.


17 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Here we go again; second round today. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 20:32, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Confirmed, no sleepers. -- zzuuzz (talk) 21:22, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Gearing up for the weekend with some habitual edits. Gowlijn flew under the radar for quite a while until provoked by the demise of Optruemo. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 18:13, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Confirmed, plus a few extras. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

24 February 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Back in the groove. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 16:14, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Confirmed and  No sleepers immediately visible. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

02 March 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Been a week since the last onslaught, and here we go again – back on ol' Hispaniola. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, no proxies used by these accounts and  No sleepers immediately visible.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

24 March 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

The named accounts come complete with a signed confession, but CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Speaking of which, the IP is a proxy and I've re-blocked it as such. I'm not sure it's Krajoyn (though the article is one of his targets) but Berean Hunter has previously observed that "{{CheckUser block}}: + proxy + sole use by sockmaster/LTA", so all kinds of creepy-crawlies may be found there. Favonian (talk) 07:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

14 May 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Edit warring to reinstate the edits of previous IP socks to the Dominican Republic article. Also shows the characteristic dislike for article talk pages, and their only edits to user talk pages (apart from their own) is this bit of unpleasantness. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Confirmed, plus:

I'd just note that some of these have been active at eswiki, where they appear to be known as Aminerie. All done here. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18 May 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Reinstated changes by previous IP sock. CU requested for proxies and sleepers. Favonian (talk) 09:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed plus Achiserv (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). Blocked w/o tags.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 13:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19 May 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Self-identifying (see deleted edit summary). CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 09:07, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Done. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

29 July 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


It's been a long time, but he's been kind enough to leave one his signature edit-summaries. As per usual, CU is requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 12:41, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

31 July 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Back in the old groove, as ill-tempered as ever. CU requested for sleepers and whatever proxy farm he now uses. Favonian (talk) 08:23, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Checked and blocked. One additional account: Indusuraq. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

07 August 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


As per usual. CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

07 August 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Suppose this qualifies as a second wave. You guessed it: CU requested for sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 19:49, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

31 August 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Doug Weller talk 11:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed and blocked. No tags. Doug Weller talk 11:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20 November 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Responding (unfavorably) to my recent protection of two of his favorite articles, there can be little doubt of this sock's identity but as is customary, I request CU for sleepers and proxies. The account was lying low for a couple of months, so the former seems more that a little likely. Favonian (talk) 13:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 November 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Repeating himself on two favorite targets, currently semi-protected which must have upset him enough to burn a semi-sleeper account of 2½ months standing. CU requested for the habitual sleepers and proxies. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

01 December 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Just waited for the previous case to be adjudicated before resuming. CU requested for sleepers and whatever colocation webhost or whatever that he's currently using. Favonian (talk) 11:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
No others seen, and no ranges that aren't already blocked. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Krajoyn/Archive&oldid=1037781213"