Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 June 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 11:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

out-of-date; the updated table is already in the article Frietjes (talk) 16:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Erie Lackawanna templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:13, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

S-line and related templates for the Erie Lackawanna Railroad which were entirely duplicative of either the Erie Railroad or the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad. I removed roughly a dozen transclusions. I can't think of any possible use that wouldn't duplicate one or the other. Mackensen (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

this navbox does not meet the soft requirement of WP:NENAN Izno (talk) 15:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 main topics linked does not meet the soft WP:NENAN bar Izno (talk) 15:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

3 links does not meet the soft requirement of WP:NENAN Izno (talk) 15:36, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

one main article and a bunch of already well-linked articles from that one main article. doesn't meet the bar for WP:NENAN Izno (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does not meet the bar for WP:NENAN. Izno (talk) 15:32, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was subst and delete (or otherwise merge with the articles). Primefac (talk) 23:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And all subtemplates. Move to d: and draw data from there (which is the purpose of the site). There is no need for persondata or infoboxes based on religion. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 01:18, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 June 11. Primefac (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. NPASR if there is a different rationale provided. Primefac (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NAVBOX with just two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Primefac (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Peruvian Armed Forces with Template:Military of Peru.
The majority of articles use the "Template:Military of XXXX" method when naming the templates of national militaries. Neighboring countries such as Colombia and Ecuador have the "Template:Military of Colombia" and the "Template:Military of Ecuador" naming method. This naming method is more organized and provides an easier option for users/readers seeking templates regarding national militaries. --ZiaLater (talk) 06:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: Per discussion with Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history. Thank you for the initial support. ----ZiaLater (talk) 10:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dissident93, are you okay with this nomination being withdrawn or do you still feel the templates require merging? Primefac (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC) (please do not ping on reply)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Team dissolved in 2015 as CSU Ploiești. Therefore, a current roster isn't applicable anymore. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).