Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 18

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 28. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by @Fastily - log entry. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with mostly plaintext, not links. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:37, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that is almost entirely WP:REDLINKS. WP:EXISTING is thus violated. No changes since 2016. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 23:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by @Fastily - log entry. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox linking loosely connected items. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by @Fastily - log entry. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:58, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that links people with 1 common characteristic. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:57, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now in use. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox linking radio stations in small area. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've remedied the lack of articles using the template. I forgot to add it to the pages when i made the template way back when... RingtailedFoxTalkContribs 04:13, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Already deleted by @Fastily - log entry. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that is redundant to multiple, in use templates. {{MissUSAs 1980–1999}}, {{MissUSAs 2000–2019}}, {{Miss USA}} etc. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 5. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:47, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 4 links. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 4 links. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. No longer unused, no longer violates WP:EXISTING. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 03:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that violates WP:EXISTING Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that links directly to countries, not to a subpage related to this topic. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that links people with very loose relationship. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox that simply collates a collation of other navboxes into one. {{Munich U-Bahn U1 navbox}}, {{Munich U-Bahn U2 navbox}}, etc... These are each implemented on the necessary pages. Putting them all in one template is just too much, plus it isn't used. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:48, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First and foremost an unused navbox. Secondly though this template is a disaster. NO offense meant towards anyone... The template is just very confusing. If it were to be used, it would really need to be blown up and started from scratch Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:42, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's better now, but I still don't think it's that useful. Best left for categories I think. --woodensuperman 09:05, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox with 25 plaintext names, (not links, not redlinks, just plaintext). The only name linked is the manager. This violates WP:EXISTING. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template is just a link to a single article. Doesn't meet WP:TG. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:25, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Nagoya Municipal Subway Kamiiida Line・Meitetsu Komaki Line. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 01:35, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 3 links. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with mostly redlinks and plaintext. WP:EXISTING. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:55, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. There are are already navboxes in widespread use for each of the counties of New Jersey. No need to this as well. WP:NENAN. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:52, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is used in nemerous navboxes that appear on articles. This links not to the individual articles, but to the templates. This is cross namespace linking that is not done in articles. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Covered both by {{Christian theology}} and {{Christianity footer}} Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox linking people who held the same position. WP:NENAN Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 28. Primefac (talk) 15:05, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with no parent page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox template. The current roster is listed on the parent page using {{Basketball roster header}} etc. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:46, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 1 valid link. WP:EXISTING violated. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:33, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 April 28. Primefac (talk) 14:44, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with many redlinks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:29, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused navbox with only redlinks and no parent article. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:28, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only redlinks. No clear parent article. Possibly Eastern New Orleans but New Orleans East District (which is the navbox title) does not exist. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with only 1 link. Parent article (Village de L'Est, New Orleans) is a redirect. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:26, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This module has two seperate usecases.

  1. The use of the ansiPercent function to encode URLs. This should be moved to Module:String as it is a string-formatting function, not one having to do with wikilinks
  2. The use of the rest module as a former dependency of Module:Format TemplateData (originally called Module:TemplateData): see #Module:Format TemplateData dependencies above

{{3x|p}}ery (talk) 15:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See one above.
  • The Module:Format TemplateData used here is of 2017 and lacks a lot of recent functionality.
  • As soon as upgraded to a current version (e.g. to show intermediate headlines on a very long parameter list, which is scrollable as well, navigating to headlines from TOC), all these dependencies will be required again.
  • You won't be able to rewrite each new release of Module:TemplateData and insert other function calls again and again.
  • Therefore, opposing as in 2018.
Regards --PerfektesChaos (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Previous TfDs for this template:
Imported as dependencies of Module:Format TemplateData (then called Module:TemplateData), which has been rewritten by me to no longer need them, so these modules are now unnecessary. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 16:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please note that de:Module:TemplateData does many, many, many things more which you definitely don't have rewritten.
  • See doc for the full picture, which has been rewritten here only with a very poor and small piece of available functionality.
  • Wrt “Multilingual” issues please see Test case or an internationalized global template on Bihari Wikpedia with Italian description, or Dutch, depending on current user language, or the similar thing in German Wikipedia but with English description.
  • Naturally I am opposing, since that is cutting down internationalized templates.
  • Note that you are using an 2017 fork of de:Module:TemplateData which lacks a lot of recent features, while the “rewritten” things are left at 2017 functionality and do not support newer developments.

Best, --PerfektesChaos (talk) 21:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 17:23, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Patriarchates. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:11, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Pentarchy with Template:Patriarchates.
Redundancy. All information provided by Template:Pentarchy is/should already be covered by Template:Patriarchates. PPEMES (talk) 15:56, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I agree that "Patriarchates" covers "Pentarchy". The first is very comprehensive and not really that easy to navigate. You have to spend time researching it! "Pentarchy" addresses a considerable smaller scope, is differently named (!), requires almost no study. It is a simple navigational template, classically named. "Patriarchates" is not a classical name, though it may be accurate for that template. Pentarchy meets a simpler need IMO. I would Keep Pentarchy. Student7 (talk) 16:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No need for this as Navbox can be used instead. WOSlinker (talk) 13:59, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox does not do what I wanted, so it is needed. Which policy arguments do you bring forward to support your proposal? Narwaro (talk) 14:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:The Young and the Restless. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:12, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:The Young and the Restless characters with Template:The Young and the Restless.
Cast, characters and families lists are mentioned at both. Only the "related articles" section from {{The Young and the Restless}} is unique to that one, and could easily be added to {{The Young and the Restless characters}} to create a single navbox. Should be combined at the shorter title {{The Young and the Restless}} though. --woodensuperman 13:04, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. No strong support, and the sole voice of opposition makes some valid points about how the two templates operate and how that could affect a merger. NPASR if these concerns are addressed/met. Primefac (talk) 23:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Display with Template:Show by date.
No need to have two separate templates for the purpose of showing text at specific times. Given that the template is used in MediaWiki:Watchlist-messages and therefore a TfD notice would show up on everyone's watchlist, I have noincluded the TfD tag. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 00:34, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Except Template:Display is not intended to be substituted? As indicated by its use in the watchlist notice? :) --Izno (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, meant Template:Show by date. (And, to reply to the edit summary, I decided the TfD tag should be noincluded shortly after starting the discussion) {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 00:36, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CoolSkittle (talk) 05:22, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).