Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Qian Zhijun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Will you now nominate Star Wars Kid for deletion by the same reasoning? There's more than whiff of cultural bias about deleting an article about "one of the most famous faces in China" while a huge array of Anglocentric memes are left untouched. — Matt Crypto 18:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the increased community focus on this type of article probably originated from the controversies about Brian Peppers, who is a white American living in Ohio. I also strongly supported deletion of Amir Massoud Tofangsazan (see AfDs and DRV thereon) about a similar situation in England. Frankly, I would not miss Star Wars Kid in its current form either. My concern remains the impact of publicity such as is created by articles such as these upon their subjects per the "do no harm" clause of BLP. Although this article was more responsible than some others have been, I continue to believe that as a top-ten website, we have an institutional responsibility in this area that we have not altogether satisfied. See generally, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Doc glasgow#Outside view by Newyorkbrad. If these and similar articles could be re-created in a way that seriously addressed these issues (omitting names and overly detailed identifying information about the subjects would be a start), my concerns would be reduced. In any event, the insinuation that my, or anyone's comments in this AfD were influenced by "cultural bias" is without substance. Newyorkbrad 18:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I will assert that there is a clear discrepancy between Wikipedia's treatment of an Anglocentric meme and a Chinese meme, and that, in my opinion, is the result of a cultural bias of the project and its participants. I don't wish to insinuate anything about you or any other particular person, but bias exists, and it's frustrating. As to your other points, I'm all for having an awareness of the impact of what we do has on real people, and I agree with you in principle, if not in the extent of the application of that principle. But still, I do find it a little bit silly that Wikipedia cannot report on "one of the most famous faces in China" based on a uncompelling argument that this could cause any real world harm. — Matt Crypto 18:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you disagree with the close, you should take the matter up with the closing administrator, or request a deletion review at WP:DRV. Newyorkbrad 18:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to be preparing a DRV request later this evening, if Matt doesn't beat me to it. I'll post to the voters and the closing admin when it's complete. I have to be honest, WP:CSB (which I'm a member of) crossed my mind as well when I saw the result. --DeLarge 19:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'll save you one post: I have DRV and this page watchlisted, so I'll automatically see when you file. Regards, Newyorkbrad 19:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]