User talk:YeBoy371

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Theknightwho in topic Types of category
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Including a Korean word in Wiktionary.

[edit]

Is this Korean word OK for inclusion in Wiktionary: 얇은? I found from a article on Wikipedia, this: [1]]. If yes, thank my edit! Many good wishes. Mihai Popa 😃📃 Talk to me! 💬My contributions! 🕔🕖13:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also created the antonym word '두꺼운'. Thank you so much for your request! YeBoy371 (talk) 14:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also, this word: 않았다, it's OK or not for inclusion in Wiktionary? Mihai Popa 😃📃 Talk to me! 💬My contributions! 🕔🕖14:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I found from [2]. So much for adding. If this is OK, thank my edit. Best wishes! Mihai Popa 😃📃 Talk to me! 💬My contributions! 🕔🕖15:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Although determiner such as '얇은' or '작은' are frequently produced, this is not the case with this word. YeBoy371 (talk) 15:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hmm... grammar error, it's "this word" or "these words" not "these word". Fix it damn!! Mihai Popa 😃📃 Talk to me! 💬My contributions! 🕔🕖15:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Then the translated part comes, by ChatGPT!

위키낱말사전에 한국어 단어 포함하기

[edit]

위키낱말사전에 이 한국어 단어를 포함해도 괜찮을까요: 얇은? 위키백과 문서에서 발견한 내용입니다: [3]]. 만약 가능하다면, 제 편집에 감사드립니다! 최고의 소망을 전합니다. Mihai Popa 😃📃 제게 이야기해 주세요! 💬내 기여들! 🕔🕖』 13:47, 2024년 6월 11일 (UTC)

또한 '두꺼운'이라는 반의어를 만들었습니다. 요청해 주셔서 정말 감사합니다! YeBoy371 (토론) 14:04, 2024년 6월 11일 (UTC)
또한, 이 단어: 않았다, 이것을 위키낱말사전에 포함해도 되는지요? Mihai Popa 😃📃 제게 이야기해 주세요! 💬내 기여들! 🕔🕖』 14:15, 2024년 6월 11일 (UTC)
이 주소에서 찾았습니다 [4]. 추가해 주셔서 감사합니다. 이것이 괜찮다면, 제 편집에 감사를 표합니다. 최고의 소망을 전합니다! Mihai Popa 😃📃 제게 이야기해 주세요! 💬내 기여들! 🕔🕖』 15:20, 2024년 6월 11일 (UTC)
'얇은'이나 '작은'과 같은 식의 관형사가 자주 생성되긴 하지만 해당 단어의 경우는 그렇지 않습니다. YeBoy371 (토론) 15:05, 2024년 6월 11일 (UTC)
음... 문법 오류입니다, "this word"나 "these words"가 맞고 "these word"는 아닙니다. 수정해 주세요!! Mihai Popa 😃📃 제게 이야기해 주세요! 💬내 기여들! 🕔🕖』 15:07, 2024년 6월 11일 (UTC)

Types of category

[edit]

Hi - thanks for adding categories to entries, as it's generally great. However, please be careful about the difference between "related to" categories (e.g. Category:en:Sleep: terms relating to sleep), and set categories (e.g. Category:en:Pigs: types of pig). You can't put pork in the second one, as it's not a type of pig. Could you please go through all the entries for meat that you've just edited and remove the animal category? Thanks. Theknightwho (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, if you're unsure, the category description says which type of category it is. Theknightwho (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
This task has been completed. YeBoy371 (talk) 16:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@YeBoy371 Thanks for the quick and thorough response. Much appreciated. Theknightwho (talk) 21:42, 21 July 2024 (UTC)Reply