About this board

Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, EpicDream86!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! Nikosguard (talk) 06:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:EpicDream86/Archive 1 on 2017-03-01.

Why is fighter wing not a subclass of wing?

4
Joshbaumgartner (talkcontribs)

Please explain why you removed this claim? A fighter wing is a subclass of a wing, specifically a wing that primarily is tasked with operating fighter aircraft.

EpicDream86 (talkcontribs)

Yes, you're correct. The item "wings" is defined for military unit size class to aviation unit size. and, wouldn't it be the same definition by adding a size designation of "wings" as a qualifier for "fighter unit"? If my define is wrong, I'll make follow your define.

This post was hidden by EpicDream86 (history)
Joshbaumgartner (talkcontribs)

You are not wrong. It certainly is a subclass of 'fighter unit' (q. size 'wing'), but I think it is equally a subclass of 'wing' (q. operates 'fighter'), so that is why generally I would add both subclass claims. I don't think there is currently a separate 'air wing' class for aviation wings in general, or at least it and 'wing' are merged, so that is why I would keep it under 'wing' for now. Classification can be fuzzy, so thoughts on it are welcome.

Reply to "Why is fighter wing not a subclass of wing?"
Sondrion (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Korean articles"
There are no older topics