Sean Barrs 's Reviews > The Word for World Is Forest
The Word for World Is Forest (Hainish Cycle, #5)
by
by
Sean Barrs 's review
bookshelves: 5-star-reads, favourites, nature-ecology-enviroment, sci-fi, postcolonial
Nov 18, 2020
bookshelves: 5-star-reads, favourites, nature-ecology-enviroment, sci-fi, postcolonial
I’ve been looking for a book like this for a very long time, a book that – at its very core – tackles the environmental destruction associated with systematic imperialism.
Now let me try to unpack that a little. I write these words as my own home (my planet) is being destroyed by mass scale consumerism, as our ever-growing appetites and population continues to decimate our own forests and natural land. This is not a new phenomenon, but as we advance technologically, we have become more adept at destroying ourselves. We continue to expand without any thought of the consequences. Time is ticking and Earth is in a sorry state.
The humans in The Word for World for Forrest have already destroyed their planet’s natural world, so they look outward and attempt to colonise other worlds to harvest their natural resources (namely wood.) Again, these humans have not a thought of consequences and by extension care little for the indigenous populations of their colonies.
And this is where the novel gets real interesting because one thing that really stood out to me – perhaps because of my own reading and background as an animal rights activist – is the association of animals with the “primitive” population. For the invading humans to morally justify enslaving them and to destroy their world (or habitat), they are considered less than human. They are associated with cows and rats and monkeys to make it easier for the colonisers to brutalise their planet. Their forests are cut down and harvested without a second thought, like we destroy the amazon rainforest because it only affects animal life and not us directly (in the present.)
For me, there is much to discuss here. Without going into too much depth about this distorted and destructive viewpoint, the novel brings out strikingly important themes about the nature of imperialism, colony, and slavery. Arguments for environmental justice are irrevocably linked with how we treat other humans and their cultures, and how we view the notion of what is "animal" and how it should be treated.
And because of this, I argue that it is an extremely important work of science-fiction because we could learn from it as a society. And this is why art is so radically essential. We have a distant future, and a distant alien world, we are dealing with intergalactic politics and racism across humanoid species, but the allegory is not too far from today.
And that's truly terrifying.
__________________________________
You can connect with me on social media via My Linktree.
__________________________________
Now let me try to unpack that a little. I write these words as my own home (my planet) is being destroyed by mass scale consumerism, as our ever-growing appetites and population continues to decimate our own forests and natural land. This is not a new phenomenon, but as we advance technologically, we have become more adept at destroying ourselves. We continue to expand without any thought of the consequences. Time is ticking and Earth is in a sorry state.
The humans in The Word for World for Forrest have already destroyed their planet’s natural world, so they look outward and attempt to colonise other worlds to harvest their natural resources (namely wood.) Again, these humans have not a thought of consequences and by extension care little for the indigenous populations of their colonies.
And this is where the novel gets real interesting because one thing that really stood out to me – perhaps because of my own reading and background as an animal rights activist – is the association of animals with the “primitive” population. For the invading humans to morally justify enslaving them and to destroy their world (or habitat), they are considered less than human. They are associated with cows and rats and monkeys to make it easier for the colonisers to brutalise their planet. Their forests are cut down and harvested without a second thought, like we destroy the amazon rainforest because it only affects animal life and not us directly (in the present.)
For me, there is much to discuss here. Without going into too much depth about this distorted and destructive viewpoint, the novel brings out strikingly important themes about the nature of imperialism, colony, and slavery. Arguments for environmental justice are irrevocably linked with how we treat other humans and their cultures, and how we view the notion of what is "animal" and how it should be treated.
And because of this, I argue that it is an extremely important work of science-fiction because we could learn from it as a society. And this is why art is so radically essential. We have a distant future, and a distant alien world, we are dealing with intergalactic politics and racism across humanoid species, but the allegory is not too far from today.
And that's truly terrifying.
__________________________________
You can connect with me on social media via My Linktree.
__________________________________
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Word for World Is Forest.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
November 16, 2020
–
Started Reading
November 18, 2020
– Shelved
November 18, 2020
– Shelved as:
5-star-reads
November 18, 2020
– Shelved as:
favourites
November 18, 2020
– Shelved as:
nature-ecology-enviroment
November 18, 2020
– Shelved as:
sci-fi
November 18, 2020
– Shelved as:
postcolonial
November 18, 2020
–
Finished Reading
Kommentare Showing 1-21 of 21 (21 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Maria
(new)
Nov 18, 2020 09:23AM
Beautiful review! You've really sold this book to me haha
reply
|
flag
Interesting review. You’ve reminded me I’ve got this book on my shelves and I may need to get to it sooner rather than later as you’ve piqued my curiosity.
Chloe wrote: "Interesting review. You’ve reminded me I’ve got this book on my shelves and I may need to get to it sooner rather than later as you’ve piqued my curiosity."
There's lots of great things going on in there! Worth a read :D
There's lots of great things going on in there! Worth a read :D
Dario wrote: "I am planning on reading Le Guin for the first time soon. I have the first four Earthsea books."
a good place to start! :D
a good place to start! :D
Le Guin herself said something like "science fiction uses the future as a metaphor for here and now". She's a wisdom keeper 💜
I really need to start reading Le Guin's SF. I already loved her fantasy work with Earthsea. Great review Sean!
A well written review Sean, thanks. I've been wanting to read more Le Guin and this has just gone to the top of the list!
Ostrava wrote: "I really need to start reading Le Guin's SF. I already loved her fantasy work with Earthsea. Great review Sean!"
Thank you for the comment - honestly - i feel le guin is so underrated. This book is so far ahead of it's time!
Thank you for the comment - honestly - i feel le guin is so underrated. This book is so far ahead of it's time!
Leana wrote: "A well written review Sean, thanks. I've been wanting to read more Le Guin and this has just gone to the top of the list!"
awesome - thank you - I hope you enjoy it too :D
awesome - thank you - I hope you enjoy it too :D
Thank you for recommending me this book. I thoroughly enjoyed it and am excited to read more from Le Guin.
She's very accurate with "associating animals with the "primitive" population". Among the many justifications Europeans had for colonizing the 'Americas' was that the people don't understand private property, so they don't own anything. Another was the idea they live without "developing" the land, so they are like animals in that they have no rights to anything.
After reading this book (and many others by amazing Le Guin, especially The ones that walk away from Omelas and this one), I'm baffled that she also was not able to make this one crucial step further and expand all this to animals. It was extremely disappointing to realize she was against veganism, empathy towards animals and used the justification 'but plants too have feelings'.
(Goodreads doesn't allow me to post a direct link but it is from her blog blog/53-a-modest-proposal-vegempathy)
I'll still use her works, especially The ones that walk away from Omelas, to remind myself so often, that I'm doing the right thing.
(Goodreads doesn't allow me to post a direct link but it is from her blog blog/53-a-modest-proposal-vegempathy)
I'll still use her works, especially The ones that walk away from Omelas, to remind myself so often, that I'm doing the right thing.